this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
157 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4543 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is not uncommon for defense attorneys to meet with federal prosecutors prior to them seeking an indictment, in the hopes of convincing them not to bring charges against their client.

Citing the doctrine of "C'mon, dude, I said I was sorry."

Edit: Also Trump: "I'M NOT SORRY AND I'LL FUCKIN DO IT AGAIN AND SOME BRAVE PATRIOT NEEDS TO DO SOMETHING TO YOUR LOVELY FAMILY"

[–] MisterMoo@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will be wild, what’s going to happen to your family!

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

*( True, as long as your family is attempting a coup, like his family.)

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

40 of 'em in one tiny car.

[–] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are there really 40 lawyers left that will work for him?

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe this set are real lawyers instead of blatant lieyers.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We will do a megathread for the next indictment if it happens today or tomorrow.

[–] stringere@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

After that, though, fuck it.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't know you could do megathreads, Lemmy is growing up. 😥

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We almost have all the same tools we had at reddit now.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He found lawyers? Last time I checked on him nobody wanted to work for him, because he didn’t pay and was hard to work with and dragged all his former lawyers into the dirt and he is, you know, guilty af.

How many of them will quit mid-meeting?

[–] Granite@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Hope they got paid upfront!

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Round 2, *** ding ***

It is not uncommon for defense attorneys to meet with federal prosecutors prior to them seeking an indictment, in the hopes of convincing them not to bring charges against their client.

[–] Spacebar@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These charges will be in Washington DC.

In DC, the rules are for a speedy trial, no courtroom cameras and they highly frown on Trump type bad-mouthing of judges and prosecutors in the media.

The coup monger will finally be held accountable!

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

As much as I want this to be true, I’ll believe it when I see it.

[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do these lawyers have TV commercials with phone numbers that are just a single digit repeated seven times?

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe the number to the firm is 877-CASH-NOW

[–] Default_Defect@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Has there been a more successful ad campaign for something you'll likely never use? The songs from these commercials were stuck in my head just about a week ago.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm frequently amazed that Trump still has lawyers.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point I assume it’s just a rotating door tag team system. Lawyers come in, make some money and then yeah out to the next. Although this all hinges on trump paying invoices which is sus at best

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

But Trump doesn't pay his lawyers...

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I would thoroughly enjoy it if someone/anyone would play that the next time the orange kumquat is filmed walking. I mean what a gif that would make!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't wait to see what Trump ~~tweets~~ ~~Xes~~ truths[?] about this?

[–] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A paradox: It is correct that posts on the Orange One's social media are called "truths". At the same time, to call anything the Orange One posts "truths" is incorrect.

Hmm... 🤔

ETA (It's more an oxymoron, but you get the idea.)

A "paradoxymoron" if you will, emphasis on the moron.

[–] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Anybody else miss the Fantasy Indictment League from Mueller She Wrote?

load more comments
view more: next ›