Vote vote vote. Money means nothing.
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
159 points (96.0% liked)
politics
18863 readers
3989 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Money at least means there are people out there telling other people to vote vote vote.
Yep, I literally get paid (almost as well as my last job requiring a degree did, this just isn’t permanent) to canvas for progressive politics in a swing state.
Honestly, I wouldn’t do it if I wasn’t getting paid, even though I firmly believe getting out the vote for progressives (or as close as we can manage at any rate) is important. There’s so much money being pumped into it, that I’m not willing to give my time for free. I’m not in the top 10%, so my time is actually valuable.
But getting paid means I’ve had conversations with ~200 voters in the last week, the majority of whom are voting dem up and down the ticket, even if they used to be strong republicans. Maybe it won’t help overall, but we have a GOP-sponsored referendum almost nobody has heard of, for which our org is encouraging a no vote, so if nothing else this effort may help defeat that.
(Hopefully this plug is ok, it’s not my organization, I just work with them. If not I’ll edit it out.) If anyone reading this is in the US, and interested in getting paid (well paid, and with insurance available from day 1) for canvassing work for a couple months, check out the outreach team’s website. They have open positions for various sponsored regional campaigns in lots of important areas across the US, and they hire quickly with minimal hoops to jump through. I worked with them for the 2020 election as well, and in both cases it was 2 days from interview to start date. https://www.theoutreachteam.net/
I’d pay for the privilege.
AIPAC has entered the chat
money is the grease that slides those juicy votes out of the crevices of the american electorate, especially in the primaries and extra especially if you have a special interest laser dot on your forehead.
having said that, yes... go vote.
I like the 2010 California election as an example.
Overall, it was a Tea Party election... except in California, where wealthy Republican candidates spent big on the Senate and Gubernatorial races... and lost.
It literally doesn't matter unless the lazy ass democratic voters get out of their complacent stupor and vote.
It's interesting the way this all gets framed. That effectively,limitless political boundary is cheerleaded. There is a subtext here that only those who can court billions with a B should or ever will be viable on a national stage.
gotta normalize this garbage. in a generation or three no one will really remember a time when it was not this.
oceania has always been at war with eurasia.
When money and finances determine who gets to be in political office and the same wealth heavily or completely dominates the government ....
.... that isn't a democracy
That's an oligarchy, a plutocracy, an aristocracy .... it's everything else but a democracy .... but what do I know, I don't have enough money to have a say any way
You're right, of course. But in this fucked up moment in history, having the normal, articulated even professional candidate raise far more than the pro business pro billionaires candidate is a good news
So we all accept that there is no democracy and do our best to support the nicest plutocrat or oligarch?
I guess what I'm saying is that at the very least, we should stop deluding ourselves in believing that this is a functioning democracy.
It's like recovery from addiction .... the first step to dealing with the problem is admitting the problem.
That's the downside of this binary election method. You can elect either this or that.
I'd be happier to hear if she's getting a lot of small dollar donors. There's been a lot of news about billionaires making donations and plainly demanding lower tax rates, firing Lina Khan, etc
She has been getting lots of small dollar donors. Many of the earlier headline touted figured were actually only looking at small donors. Not only that but large numbers of first time donors
From the article
But the August haul comes on the heels of largely small donors (those giving less than $200) and first-time donors contributing to Harris’ July fundraising. In the first week of her campaign, roughly two-thirds of donations came from first-time donors
She needs to start spending it. Early voting starts in 12-18 days in some states.
What about the corrupt judge and election official race?
What about the militia race?
Please spend effectively.