this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
22 points (89.3% liked)

vegan

2545 readers
16 users here now

Please also check out vegantheoryclub.org for a great set of well-run communities for vegan news, cooking, gardening, and art. It is not federated with LW, but it is a nice, cozy, all-in-one space for vegans.


We ask that the you have an understanding on what veganism is before engaging in this community.

If you think you have been banned erroneously, please get in contact with one of the other mods for appeals.

Moderator reports may not federate properly and may delay moderator action. Please DM an active mod if an abusive comment remains after reporting it.


Welcome

Welcome to c/vegan@lemmy.world. Broadly, this community is a place to discuss veganism. Discussion on intersectional topics related to the animal rights movement are also encouraged.

What is Veganism?

'Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals ...'

— abridged definition from The Vegan Society

Rules

The rules are subject to change, especially upon community feedback.

  1. Discrimination is not tolerated. This includes speciesism.
  2. Topics not relating to veganism are subject to removal.
  3. Posts are to be as accessible as practicable:
    • pictures of text require alt-text;
    • paywalled articles must have an accessible non-paywalled link.
  4. Content warnings are required for triggering content.
  5. Bad-faith carnist rhetoric & anti-veganism are not allowed, as this is not a space to debate the merits of veganism. Anyone is welcome here, however, and so good-faith efforts to ask questions about veganism may be given their own weekly stickied post in the future (see current stickied discussion).
    • before jumping into the community, we encourage you to read examples of common fallacies here.
    • if you're asking questions about veganism, be mindful that the person on the other end is trying to be helpful by answering you and treat them with at least as much respect as they give you.
  6. Misinformation, particularly that which is dangerous or has malicious intent, is subject to removal.

Resources on Veganism

A compilation of many vegan resources/sites in a Google spreadsheet:

Here are some documentaries that are recommended to watch if planning to or have recently become vegan:

Vegan Fediverse

Lemmy: vegantheoryclub.org

Mastodon: veganism.social

Other Vegan Communities

General Vegan Comms

!vegan@lemmy.ml

!vegan@hexbear.net

!vegan@vegantheoryclub.org

!vegan@slrpnk.net

Circlejerk Comms

!vegancirclejerk@lemmy.ml

Vegan Food / Cooking

!homecooks@vegantheoryclub.org

!veganrecipes@sh.itjust.works

!recipes@vegantheoryclub.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This may be a controversial post because it strays from the exploitation of non-human animals, but this is a story about human bodies being sold and used without their prior consent, which to me speaks to a similar (albeit more severe) indignity that non-human animals face in the medical industry. That is to say "this isn't vegan". Feel free to downvote this post heavily and say as much in the comments if you feel this isn't on-topic for this community, as I know there are plenty of other places that will address this with an appropriate level of appallment.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

We eating people now?

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be honest, yes this should be forbidden, but active consent is often rare.

And to be fair, these people are already dead. So I would say it is vegan, as this is not their purpose, they were not bred, not held and are also not eaten but used for education, research and helping living humans.

Idk I dont find this that crazy? Even though family members should of course be able to claim the bodies, and yeah it is kinda sick to scratch corpses of poor people off the street and look at them only when they are dead.

That context makes it more fucked up.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's exploitation of an animal. what definition are you using that makes this vegan?

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

If using a dead body for these purposes is exploitation or not is a philisophical or even religious/spiritual/belief question.

As far as we know, if an animal dies, the corpse doesnt feel, experience or live anymore.

As these animals (people) didnt die because of this, it is not exploitation, I would say.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

the barest definition of "exploit" is "use". using animal products is the exact thing vegans don't do.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'd argue it's vegan to use animal products if and only if the animal has died through no means of your own and you are not indirectly causing more exploitation.

Second hand leather is not vegan because you indirectly support the leather industry by fueling demand for leather. Someone may be more inclined to purchase something made of leather if they know they can resell it at a later date (like a leather sofa).

However, I'd argue eating roadkill you accidentally killed yourself would qualify as vegan since there are no moral issues with that - consuming it doesn't fuel the demand for animal exploitation. Additionally, it causes you to consume less food produced through industrial agriculture (which is not sustainable in its current form), making kt better for the environment.

For me, exploitation := intentionally harming an animal as a means to an end

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago

your personal definition is not widely used enough to make it into a lexicon.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I am not sure about exact definitions.

But afaik vegans dont finance or encourage animal "use". Like buying, buying for a lower price, eating in front of other people thus normalizing it etc.

This doesnt apply at all in this case. There are no people (well, anymore) killing others to get medicinal corpses. So you dont normalize anything and you also dont fuel any market.

I mean, we have laws for that. On a free market this could increase the demand and people could start killing people to sell them.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

But afaik vegans dont finance or encourage animal “use”.

nor participate

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 25 minutes ago

If you participate, you encourage.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 21 hours ago

I would say exploit is getting a benefit from someone without giving anything back.

This is a corpse, it doesnt feel, you cant give it anything. As far as we know.

You can bury it but this is really just a concern of the relatives etc.

It's also just living people that care about what happens with their body. My guess: this is a egoistic response, which is understandable, but makes no sense when you are dead.

Simply because we cannot imagine how it is to be dead.

That would be a point against opt-in.