this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
313 points (97.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6608 readers
517 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They going to tear open the battery while they are at it? It’s not like there’s going to be a small lump labeled “RDX” with wires sticking out of it.

While they’re at it, why not incorporate the explosive into the body of the device? Has no one else seen Up in Smoke?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I suspect that's not far off from what Israel did, from my understanding they modified a device's at a production level, it sounds like they essentially redesigned the pager.

It will be interesting to see how they did it with the radios.

[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel like a broken record reminding people that the TAO (Tailored Access Operations, now Computer Network Operations), part of the NSA, has been doing this for 20 years. Except they implant spyware instead of explosives. Probably.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This predates the NSA, but they blew up a Russian pipeline with modified software.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They blew up a Soviet pipeline by leaking bad pipeline turbine designs via the Line X program. Nothing to do with the NSA hacking supply chains and more due to double agents leaking deliberately bad designs, and the Soviets failing to stress test them.

The NSA was created in the 50s and was around at this point; this was the CIAs show.

See also: the Farewell Dossier

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It doesn't predate the nsa, but the Cia contracted out the work through a Canadian firm iirc.

The nsa doesn't have the mandate for clandestine activities, only reconnaissance.

Porqué no los dos?

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They designed into the circuit boards an actual Nano Ford Pinto

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You could get a new battery from a known good source (or light a couple on fire to make sure they're not explosive). It should be relatively easy to check the rest of the components for anything near a dangerous amount of explosive, and the body can be replaced with a custom one and/or subjected to the fire test.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Even a fire test may not produce accurate results (see C4). Better to not have distinct supply lines from the civilian population you're already hiding in.

[–] tal 22 points 1 month ago

I believe it's ICOM, not Baofeng.

https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-820735

What are the ICOM IC-V82 radios exploding in Lebanon?

On that note, one review on eham.net from twelve years back for this radio is amusing:

https://www.eham.net/reviews/view-product?id=5046

Watch out for fake v82's! Only buy from authorized retailers or someone who did.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I imagine being at war with Israel will induce paranoia from here out.

[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'm ok with that. I am drinking cheap, dry champagne right now in real life.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I don’t know why you think this will be an isolated event, a civilian you probably don’t have anything to worry about in the same way you don’t need to worry about getting poisoned or shot but this is now an attack method governments will take advantage of.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

would RDX increase or decrease baofeng interference? only one way to find out

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Wait, what frequency sets off the....

BOOM

BAOFENG transmits on all frequencies, it's just louder on the ones they intend

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Don't forget to check the tin foil hats too!

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would be nice if all militant preppers get rid of their electronic devices like this

At least one extremist echo chamber fewer.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had an roommate do that with an xbox360 once

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That must have looked funny.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io -4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

protip: if you're not connected to a terrorist group targeting israel, you've got nothing to worry about

[–] Eylrid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's interesting who we call terrorists and who we don't. If an Arab nation or organization had done this it would have been called a terrorist attack. Israel does it and people defend it.

Terrorist is a meaningless scare word for "people we don't like".

[–] verity_kindle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Ok, but this is NCD. Would you like a flute of Trader Joe's finest champagne? It's not very good, but it's free.

[–] pickman_model@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

'Terrorist' is a shorthand for 'Terrorist we don't like'

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

Or if you are a child who happens to be near one maybe you just die anyway

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We read on the news 'Hezbollah pagers' and assume that this was a targeted attack. But are we sure? What does it even mean? Who and how got those devices?

Hezbollah handed out these pagers to their combatants a few days before they exploded. Some were even still in their packaging.