this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
256 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2608 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 71 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's safe to assume at this point that delays and chaos (and the opportunities both will provide for fraud) are the exact point.

This time around, Georgia is going to be prepared to "find" Trump however many votes he needs.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The real question is whether they're going to bother actually doing the math to make it believable, or if they're going to give Trump 105% of the state's population worth of votes.

[–] tallricefarmer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

i am thinking they are going to scrutinize black neighborhood polling stations and say they didn't match the hand count of total ballots with the digital total and therefore this polling station is invalid or something

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Significant delay combined with the party that insists elections are supposed to be over at midnight. Seems like an obvious recipe to count certain votes first and then whoops out of time.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly. Low-population areas are Republican-leaning and will get counted fast. Cities which are Democratic-leaning won't have the staff to count it in one night.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lots of places have rules about how many polling stations per county. It's designed to create lines to vote in cities and no lines in rural areas.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How is this not shut down as obvious voter suppression. What other reason could there be for doing this? How do they justify it?

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

They don't justify it, they just do it. Same with gerrymandering.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's not a bug; it's a feature.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

That same party already made it much more onerous for people of color to vote in Georgia which will mean fewer votes to count as well

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And don’t even think about giving water to people stuck in line for hours in the heat. That’s a felony. (Okay its a misdemeanor, and a judge “paused enforcement” of it sort of.)

Fuckery Ahoy!!

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Could one person go along the queue, giving out 1 penny's.

Then a second person go along the queue, selling bottles of water for a penny?

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yes. Yes you can. At least you could about 4 years ago. I live in GA and was going to do this last election but turns out my county don't enforce this dumb freaking rule so I did all that research for nothing.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fuck. They passed it. Harris just lost Georgia.

Look into the details of what was passed. It won't simply delay reporting, it will allow them to refuse certification of results based on almost anything, including "suspicious" results, i.e., Trump losing under any circumstance. They've also installed loyalists across the state to halt certifications based on that principle on purpose.

Georgia just successfully overthrew democratic elections in their state. They did it after working out loud and in public on it for four years, and no one did anything about it. I'm dead serious when I say that this functionally and practically, which is all that matters, makes it impossible for Harris to win Georgia.

Incredible. And incredibly sad.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

So by law all ballot boxes will have their seals broken immediately.

Fucking Jenius, georgia republiQans! That’s such a vote-securing idea! Also when all your Big Lie accusations become plans, you’ve gone full seditionist, just FYI ok? Ok!

[–] Westdragon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

The delay is intended by Republicans, in order to cause a crisis that goes to SCOTUS... who seems to be owned and operated by the GOP. I'd say lets compromise... they can hand count and if not done by the cutoff then their votes simply are not admitted. Sucks to the non Republicans in the juristictions but hey, why let these dumbshits screw up the whole election?

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a Canadian and former campaign volunteer (and poll observer) this is really weird to me. Federal elections in Canada are always hand-counted. Results at each polling station are counted in front of volunteer observers from each party (as well as neutral observers) and then delivered to Elections Canada where they’re tallied (in front of lawyers from each party) and results are reported to the media.

It’s not a big deal and there’s no chaos.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

It's a lot more doable when you don't have a 6 page ballot with several dozen offices on it and have planned and budgeted for hand counts. It's hard to do with lots of positions on the ballot, little notice that it's going to be done, and no money to hire staff to do the counting

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

reminder that they are hand counting ballots that the ballot marking machine printed out, instead having of the computerized polling system the Republican governor put in a few years ago to ensure accuracy count them.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

TBF that same Republican governor deleted the data during an investigation into the vote count because he was overseeing his own election. Hand counting could potentially be more accurate...

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

HARRIS JUST LOST GEORGIA.

This is basically the first election result. Trump just won his first 16 electoral college votes. This should be HUGE news.

Trump loyalists now have the power to privately count votes and additionally have the power to not certify any results for reasons left intentionally vague.

Let me reiterate. HARRIS JUST LOST THE STATE OF GEORGIA.

[–] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I looked up this story on the Gateway Pundit because I'm a sadist i guess. The comments were...about what you'd expect. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/huge-georgia-state-election-board-passes-rule-requiring/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›