this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

news

23445 readers
685 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The solution is simple xigma-male: state owned alternative with zero fees.

[–] Jacobo_Villa_Lobos@hexbear.net 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Even the most succdem brained person should understand this. Payment systems are so reliant on the network effect because nobody is going to use on a network that people don’t accept. Like, try traveling with a Discover card outside of the USA (China and Japan excepted).

I don’t know enough to say that payment networks like Visa and Mastercard are natural monopolies, but it seems like this is structurally something that’ll happen. Therefore, even the most succdem brained person would understand that payments need to be public infrastructure, not a duopoly of US-based megacorps.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago

grill-broke: “Buh…buh….it’s a private business! Everyone knows that business is super perfect in every way! Corporate run ANARKY 4 LYFE!”

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

Even in Europe the fees they can charge customers is capped at like 1/10th of US fees

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago

Remember talk of postal banking during Bernie's campaign?

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Stop sanctions? porky-scared

Stop fueling wars? porky-scared

Stop meddling in others affairs? porky-scared

Hit Visa up for a hit of non consequential juice..I mean cost of doing buisnees....er "fine" which will result in a half assed rate cut to vendors and rate hike to consumers in higher interest and fees....oh and less 'rewards' and call it a win. liberalism porky-happy

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh wow just one of ten billion suits the government should have been pursuing over a decade ago.

The fact that these cowards are doing an antitrust suit and didn't just blackbag the CEO and other high up officers in the company when their response to obviously being a monopoly (it's quite literally just Visa and Mastercard and Visa is far bigger) was "pfft. No! Pfft. Look at all these competitors! Like Mastercard! And... did we mention Mastercard?"

It's like Microsoft or Apple trying to claim they don't do monopolistic shit, that they don't hold de facto monopolies in certain sectors, because "Well, there is literally one competitor! So technically just because we hold 95% of the market, that means we aren't a monopoly!" No. That's not how this works.

Well, it does because 1) a ton of people who even see this stuff don't care or very cuckedly (yeah, I'm making that up and using it) support it. And 2) this suit is being brought late in the year immediately before an election when the suit has been deserved since... at least 2008. At least. It's just being thrown out to say "See? Eh? You see that one? We did something! What was the result of our lawsuit against Apple, a clear monopoly holder that charges $99/year to develop apps and locks customers from using their devices which should be the easiest slam dunk "you must allow root access" outcome ever? Stop asking! WE DID SOMETHING!"

How about using just 0.1% of the energy they've been spending on college kids mad about genocide on any of these CEOs if only for personal grievance "fuck you!" reasons. Imagine being the USAG and Visa's top attorney scoffs at you like that when they are absolutely obviously a monopoly. Even if you're a massive paid shill, send that asshole to a blackhole just because, you know, you still can.

[–] Speaker@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The most important question I took from all this: is it pronounced "cucked-ly" or "cuck-ed-ly"?

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Hmm, user preference I think. I think the latter version displays more contempt though.

[–] Huldra@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

Criminals and crooks usually find any large scale attention unwanted.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

Nothing of consequence will happen because if the consequences were adequately severe then the business might falter or fail and we all know these finance titans are "too big to fail" and killing the economic parasite might kill the economic host.