this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
294 points (91.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

And in “tell Us Something we Didn’t Already Know” news.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (16 children)

I didn’t really know what the Green Party was until a few years ago. I originally thought Green meant pro-environment but it really just stands for green cash money from Daddy Vlad.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 69 points 1 month ago (14 children)

If the green party even actually cared about the shit they purport to care about, they'd have been pro nuclear. That's all I needed to hear in order to know they were worth absolutely none of my attention.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 83 points 1 month ago (8 children)

They also be active more than one out of every four years. You NEVER hear a word about any of them between elections. They’re spoilers. Nothing more.

The veil is lifted finally.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What might have had some efficacy as an auxiliary party is if the organization promoted specific extant primary candidates, perhaps. To assist more progressive candidates in becoming the nominees for various electoral races. AND in local elections, not JUST the big one every four years like you said!

We've seen this work (to our detriment) with the 'tea party' -_- all i'm saying is, it pisses me off that we leave that kind of weaponry on the table when these fucking chud scum manage to pull it off.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"Green" and "pro nuclear" go together like peas and carrots. Unless one flunked elementary school science class.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Jill Stein ~~Is Killing~~ killed the Green Party

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

Jill Stein is the latest in an interminable line of Green Party fucknuts "killing" the Green Party.

Next.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was there anything there to kill?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A bucket full of russian mob money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›