this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
53 points (96.5% liked)

World News

39165 readers
2070 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tal 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

But what Ms Salagaras and the dozens of others who purchased the cookies didn't know was that their baked goods were five days old, purchased at a store in Hawaii by people unaffiliated with Crumbl Cookie (Crumbl), and flown back to Australia.

Hmm. Setting aside trademark law, that sounds like a legitimate concern from a consumer standpoint. This "Crumbl Cookie" company presumably wouldn't intentionally sell five-day-old baked goods under their brand, and as a consumer, I'd distinguish between fresh cookies and five-day-old cookies, even if five-day-old cookies are perfectly edible. Maybe there's an argument for making it normal to also rate the maximum age of a given baked good -- I don't know if that's mandated in the US, but bakeries I've seen normally distinguish between bagels and day-old bagels, for example.

But setting legalities aside...I wonder how practical it would be to do something like this and get better output than these guys flying the things did?

Most of the time, it probably makes sense to just bake whatever the thing is domestically. But it sounds like the issue here is that the demand is small in scale, not enough to support a domestic bakery:

"I think the fact that our market is small here, means that there's a lot of things that never get here," said Ellen Garbarino, a professor in marketing at the University of Sydney's Business School.

According to Professor Garbarino, many international brands are unlikely to open permanent locations in Australia due to the required costs and expected return.

"The cost of setting that up is pretty high, to get it into the shelves or to get a retail outlet and pay rent and get customers and get staff and all those kinds of things, and get over the laws of a different country."

So for Australia -- and, hell, anyone to some degree -- it might make sense to just try to do a better job of being able to ship stuff and keep it as fresh as possible.

https://www.quora.com/What-chemical-reaction-causes-food-to-go-stale

There isn’t a single well-defined meaning of “stale.” When we say bread is stale, we usually mean it’s hard. Interestingly, this is due to the bread absorbing water from the air (water usually softens things, doesn’t it?) If bread is slightly hardened, you may be able to restore some of its freshness by microwaving it. This will make it obviously moist, and you can then toast it. This is also a good procedure if you freeze bread, which we have to do in our household because otherwise we eat way too much :) It’s not like super-fresh bread, but I find it edible.

Another meaning of “stale” is partially rotten or rancid. Rotting is generally due to bacterial growth. Rancidification is chemical oxidation of fats to fatty acids, which is why rancid butter tastes sour (acids are sour).

I mean, there are ways that you can counter that. They will add cost to the item. But they're doable.

Like, you can make something not rot by irradiating it sufficiently and then sealing the food in a sterile environment.

Storing them in a low-oxygen environment, like under carbon dioxide, can cut into oxidation (though I'm not sure that that'd help much for cookies if they use yeast to rise, since the yeast would require oxygen, though maybe they're okay if you use baking soda to make them rise).

You could control humidity in the transport container.

https://discover.texasrealfood.com/food-shelf-life/oreos

The shelf life of Oreos can depend on various factors, including the storage method and whether the package has been opened. A packet of Oreos typically comes with a "best before" date, which is usually set for 9 to 12 months after the manufacturing date. This date serves as a guideline for optimal freshness rather than a hard expiration date. When stored properly in a cool, dry place, unopened Oreos can retain their quality slightly beyond this date, while opened Oreos should be consumed within a shorter timeframe to enjoy their characteristic crunch and flavor.

Oreos are designed to have a pretty impressive shelf life, as long as you don't open the package. They're very dry. The problem with these "Crumbl Cookie" things is trying to use a cookie that isn't designed to have a shelf life but to get more of one. So you can't alter the cookie, can't add preservatives or something.

But some of the processes I listed above don't require modifying the original cookie.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

But setting legalities aside…I wonder how practical it would be to do something like this and get better output than these guys flying the things did?

Ghost kitchens can be rented for not very much in terms of expense. using a ghost kitchen rental, you can bake them the night before and sell them in the morning. Some of the spaces I'm looking at, it's about 150/month (USD) for a furnished kitchen. you can then drive them out that morning to outlets (Grocery stores, gas stations, farmers markets?).

alternatively, its about 2k for a low end comercial convection oven, about 6k for a conveyer/impinger oven (which would offer higher through-put on the cookies and bake-on-demand.) a comercial mixer goes for abotu 1k, and then there's the truck... which not gonna guess at.

the airfare, if that's what they were doing is 150 for the cheapest ticket, which would stack up. from what I can tell, general shipping starts at around that much as well. Meaning that it would stack up quickly. So for a one time thing where you were scalping somebody else's product? sure, it might make some sense. but you're going to lose business fast since nobody is going to willingly pay 20 bucks for stale cookies, especially if they taste like the inside of someone's luggage. (Though, I suspect they were shipped as airfreight, which is why it took 5 days to get out there. Not sure which would be worse. Tasting like someone's luggage, or tasting like an amazon box.)

Personally, if I'm spending that much on a cookie, it had better be made fresh and come warm and gooey. Just saying.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was so excited with crumbl opened up by me. We waited two weeks to let the lines die down a little. I went in ordered from the little kiosk. Spent an incredibly large amount on it a box of cookies.

I love soft crumbly cookies. They were expensive AF, so I was really stoked.

I took them outside sat down at the table with my family and we each tried them. After the first bite we all looked at each other, kind of frowned in almost in unison said they're okay.

They're sweet, bland, just really overrated. I'd say that most grocery store bakeries probably make a better cookie.

[–] Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I agree. They are better looking than they are tasting.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Crumbl is as artificial as it gets. Test-marketed and focus-grouped to death, run through social media, some kind of awful amalgamation of online recipes, run it back through focus groups etc. etc. They’re not selling a cookie, they’re selling marketing and hype, and it’s gross enough to keep those alive for five days.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago

SLAM

Not reading your article, fuck off

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you spend nearly $20 for a single cookie, I kind of feel like you get what you deserve.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

There's a cookie place that opened in a prime spot about 10m from my front door. It's c$6 or maybe us$4. It's already so much that I've only tried one.

Honestly, they're 'meh' too. They're a $2 cookie but not a $6 cookie.

I cannot imagine a us$20 cookie. Like, it needs to come with a free cheeseburger or something. :-D

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

ABC News Australia - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for ABC News Australia:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - Australia
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-10-06/nsw-sydney-crumbl-cookie-pop-up-consumer-trademark-law/104417826
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support