this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
56 points (96.7% liked)

videos

22709 readers
68 users here now

Breadtube if it didn't suck.

Post videos you genuinely enjoy and want to share, duh. Celebrate the diversity of interests shared by chapochatters by posting a deep dive into Venetian kelp farming, I dunno. Also media criticism, bite-sized versions of left-wing theory, all the stuff you expected. But I am curious about that kelp farming thing now that you mentioned it.

Low effort / spam videos might be removed, especially weeb content.

There is a cytube that you can paste videos into and watch with whoever happens to be around. It's open submission unless there's something important to commandeer it with at the time.

A weekly watch party happens every Saturday (Sunday down under), with video nominations Saturday-Monday, voting Monday-Thursday. See the pin for whatever stage it's currently in.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 63 points 1 month ago (3 children)

People aren't hungry because there isn't enough food. Food corporations throw out a ton of food.

Capitalism is what is starving people

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

World hunger is not just about food waste but also unequal distribution on an international scale. When China develops a rice variety that grows in salty marshes or Brazil develops a soy variety that grows in savannah conditions, you give countries in the Global South the opportunity to grow food not only locally but much more productively. At that point the problem becomes a matter of solving the underlying issues with international financing, which is one of the things Michael Hudson is talking about.

This rice variety seems like a godsend even in a liberal capitalist hole like Brazil.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At that point the problem becomes a matter of solving the underlying issues with international financing, which is one of the things Michael Hudson is talking about.

But that IS the capitalism problem, no?

[–] CarmineCatboy2@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The point was that new technologies aren't irrelevant because capitalism. Food waste and the shackles of imperialist finance affect different countries disproportionately. But the latter was always cushioned by the fact that, historically, it was straight up impossible for non temperate countries to become food sufficient. At least not in an industrial context. Every advancement in that direction for the past 60 years have created pathways that undermined the basis of imperialist finance.

Yes, if you're American you have an entire temperate continent to exploit. In these conditions it all boils down to redistribution, wether within or outside of capitalist hegemony. But if you've been Indian, Brazilian, Chinese or South African ever since the Green Revolution what you needed was new crops. Productive enough to outcompete cheap exports from the imperial core. That is why countries like Angola became interested in the Brazilian soy, and countries like Indonesia became interested in the Chinese marshy rice. This new rice that the video talks about is revolutionary for pretty much everyone.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

I mean, I don't disagree that it's awesome and that waste isn't the real problem, but...

Productive enough to outcompete cheap exports from the imperial core.

The cheap exports are a result of international finance fucking over the labor in the producing countries who are locked into their shitty loans by corrupt puppets of Western imperialism. Those cheap exports are just the international trade equivalent of Loss Leaders. Making a cheaper competitor isn't going to stop the coups or the NGOs or the right wing death squads. The prohibitive problem isn't the cost, it's the barrel of the gun pointed at the third world holding them hostage to the system. If anything, I'd say this is more likely to help those states who are already exiled from the western community like DPRK, Cuba, and Venezuela.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

I see, that makes a lot of sense

[–] ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 month ago

I know, that's just the title of the video.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

I agree, but you need the potato to have a potato famine (read: British occupation exporting food like they did in India and other countries while the people starve)

[–] JillOfAllTrades@hexbear.net 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Death to clickbait.

Especially in video form where you can't easily skim.

The internet is not a good experience no more.

[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The worst is when they do it with critical safety info

"The FDA just issued a safety recall on this common food item"

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

CDC: One Neat Trick to Not Die; Funeral Directors Hate Him

it's incredible how purchased ads trying to aesthetically appear like headlines have had such a dramatic impact on the crafting of editorial headlines.

it's almost like the NEWS under capitalism was always going to suck as the distinction between its press and advertising/marketing are functionally the same.

[–] Tom742@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

I know it's reddit, so who really cares, but I get a good chuckle seeing the "promoted posts" (ads) that are something like

TIL that geico has supreme insurance and I could be saving hundreds of dollars a year

but with all the comments turned off to prevent any sort of natural engagement.

It's interesting how advertising co-opts any culture around it

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

Should go to actual jail for this kind.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

The US will no longer be able to dump cheap agricultural goods on developing countries thus undermining their food security and making them reliant on the exports of empire.

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Will take a lot more than a crop to end world hunger

[–] SadArtemis@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It'll be a good start. The most important thing though will definitely be overthrowing the evil empire which disincentivizes and works to prevent agricultural self-sufficiency across the global south (Prof. Michael Hudson has a great talk on this and more), which uses illegal sanctions and destabilization (like in Syria where they openly state the prime agricultural and oil-producing regions are specifically targeted for occupation) to manufacture famines, and which threatens the shipping lanes of the entire globe.

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] Weedian@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago

...which is why we need to preemptively nuke china

[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago

Its too bad topsoil degradation is accelarating. Something like this could have bought some time.

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Doubling the yield is super pog especially with the coming climate crisis.

[–] LodeMike 16 points 1 month ago

World hunger is a logistical problem

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

"the University of Queensland in the USA"

Yes the US loves to name things after their queen. Hope the rest of the stuff in the video isn't as inaccurate.

[–] sweatersocialist@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

china created a supercock that could end world horny?!?

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: