this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
200 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18840 readers
4468 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 96 points 11 months ago (6 children)

So he dismissed the case after he was scheduled to give a deposition? I wonder if his lawyer realized there was a massive risk of Trump committing perjury and only a very slim chance they'd actually win so advised to drop the case. Either that or they never intended to actually take things to trial and this was always just about the optics as an attempt to discredit Cohen.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I follow a few lawyer YouTubers, like the hosts of the Legal AF podcast.

They all predicted that Trump would drop the case this week because he's run out of ways to avoid the deposition.

In fact, last week, he lied to the judge in that case, saying that he couldn't make the scheduled deposition this week because he had to be in court all week. But he skipped out on that trial on Wednesday, so that was a lie.

So he was about to have to do the deposition that might ruin him, and he'd also have to explain to the judge why he lied. So guaranteed that he'd drop the case instead.

To these lawyers, the only question was whether Cohen would counter sue, and it seems likely that he will.

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 23 points 11 months ago

A counter-suit would be a spicy meatball and I very much hope to see it.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Or possibly/hopefully with the fraud case he just lost he remembered he doesn't have any money

[–] coffeetest@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think that is all true. He did his best to avoid the deposition and when suddenly forced into it, dropped the case. If I have it right, his witness list was him and Cohen - "my word vs yours" doesn't make for a legit sounding $500M suit. I think it was done purely for revenge reasons. He dragged Cohen through the process, caused significant legal expenses etc.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

And Cohen will likely make him pay for that with a counter-suit.

[–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I wonder if there will be an anti SLAPP action soon from Cohen's team. (Not sure what the rules are in that jurisdiction.)

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

at this point there is nothing but downside to him opening his mouth.. for the rest of his life pretty much..

[–] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He's got idiots for lawyers because the good ones won't take him as a client. I suspect that he suddenly realized that he can't be in all places at once and decided to walk away from one piece of revenge.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Not just lawyers, the only ones who do business with Trump are idiots or the incredibly desperate (soon to be even more so once Trump stiffs them on their bill). Or I suppose his fellow scumbags that think they can use Trump to advance their own goals, but who he inevitably but quite predictably at this point ends up turning on. Trump is a walking liability in every sense of the word, absolutely nothing good comes of interacting with him in any way. He's like an anti-Midas, everything he touches turns from gold into shit.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

A countersuit would be hilarious.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 11 months ago

A small part of me wonders if he's lawyers dismissed it just so they could tell him a judge finally agreed to drop one of his cases.

[–] skellener@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Running out of money?

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Wasn't that just filed yesterday?