this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
669 points (98.7% liked)

RetroGaming

19383 readers
983 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dabu@lemmy.world 45 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

It's the same with lots of indie games now. Oh, and mobile ones too

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 29 points 15 hours ago

Back in the day, deep down you knew what you were really getting. I'm a little annoyed these days when indie games use marketing visuals that look like they could be in-game for a modern title and then it's all pixel art style. I get that you don't make a pixel art poster, but in that case, go all-in on an art cover don't let it be mistaken for game graphics.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Bro, that stupid game with the guys that shoot barrels to get more fighters/better weapons looked fun. The actual game is a shitty base builder with timed progression, of course you can pay to get past the time locks. Fuck that company and every "influencer" that takes their dirty money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 31 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I was always so disappointed in the 90s to see 'realistic' looking graphics and then you play the game and realize it was just a point and click game

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 31 points 15 hours ago (13 children)

Everyone always praised Myst for its great graphics. I always thought it was cheating because it was pre-rendered.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 14 hours ago

there were engineering competitions in the late nineties for realtime rendered games. they tended to look like vetrex games.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 6 points 14 hours ago

Speaking for myself but in 1995 or whatever I didn’t even know what the term rendered was. Game looked cool but I liked Tex Murphy Under a Killing Moon for state of the art graphics lol

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly graphics aren't really that important compared to the gameplay. Games such as those in the UFO 50 collection are a really good example of that. Also if you actually want a quality god vs satan game with old school graphics then I highly recommend Grimstone.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

UFO 50 is so damn good

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

but all the fun is taking the game graphics and transforming it in your head to resemble the cover art

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 16 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

the back usually showed gameplay shots.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 20 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Final Fantasy. Flowing dramatic artwork. 18 pixels of character (hyperbole, idk the actual pixel number.)

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The character sprites were 16x24 in combat, so a whole 384 pixels to work with!

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

A 386 could handle that easily and still have two pixels left.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] helloharu@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

To be fair, I’ve never seen anything come close to Amanos illustratative work.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 13 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I had Bad Street Brawler for the NES and it's so bad, it's funny. Even back in the day.... fighting midgets, dogs, and circus strongmen, trying to get to the dumpster at the end of the level, and with 2-player coop to boot

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 6 points 13 hours ago

I somehow missed Bad Street Brawler and went for Bad Dudes because I played that one at the arcade. Wasn't nearly as good as the arcade version though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 19 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (8 children)

I can't research it at the moment, but I want to say that was a common thing in the pre-NES days, and I think Nintendo required actual gameplay graphics to be shown on the box because of that.

Could be off on the specifics, but I do vaguely recall those kinds of non-representative box art having some controversy.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LemUrun@pawb.social 6 points 16 hours ago

The art vs. the game

Oh well...

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Looks like a swell game to me!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›