this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
29 points (87.2% liked)

Privacy

31660 readers
359 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This has to be against some kind of law right?

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

Moral of the story? Don't read the Express. To quote Dave Gorman, it's a crock of shit.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Saw this on Sunday. I think it fits here...

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The website doesn't really care; they have hosting costs so if you're not paying with money or by accepting ads then to them you're worse than not visiting at all as you consume resources, so it's good if you leave?

So, it's win win. Good scenario.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

thank brexiters for that, it's illegal in eu

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 hour ago

no it's not, it's a loophole in the legislation that was actually first used and is still most popular in France?

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Remind me why we left again

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 hours ago

Don’t worry, once they have your credit card number they’ll track you even more. At best you’ll get a £‎2.35 cheque from a class action lawsuit in seven years, assuming they ever even get caught.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Now that's the real PrivacyPlus™

And it's free.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Never heard of consent-o-matic. I'm gonna have to check it out

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Is this related to the new laws in Europe? I remember seeing something about Facebook introducing a paid tier

[–] ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What a fantastic website not to visit

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I just wanted to read one article, so i have to pay to reject cookies even though I'll probably never end up on that site again. What a fuckin joke!

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

It's the express, you're better off never reading a word they print

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Archive.is is your friend

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Not really, it's just phrased differently to the usual signup pitch, they're putting in a middle ground between full "premium" subscribers (whatever that is) and public access with tracking and ad metrics.

Companies need revenue to operate. They get that revenue from advertising data and selling ad slots, or subscriptions. Whether they actually cease all tracking and ad metrics when you subscribe is something I'd doubt though, and that could be a case for the legal system if they didn't do what they claim.

Personally, this behaviour is the point where I would not consider the site to be valuable enough to bother with.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Wasn't it illegal to not let a user reject a cookie? In the EU at least

[–] Echo5@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Besides the point but are you able to get around it with internet archive?

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Gets around it perfectly