this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
260 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2947 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

North Korea has sent troops to Russia, the United States said Wednesday, its first public confirmation of a move that has rattled Western allies and could mark a major escalation of Moscow’s war in Ukraine.

“There is evidence of DPRK troops in Russia,” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters in Rome, using the abbreviation for North Korea’s formal name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

"What exactly they're doing is left to be seen," Austin said, adding, "We're trying to gain better fidelity on it." It's a "serious issue," he said, if North Korea's "intention is to participate in this war on Russia's behalf."

His comments came after South Korea and Ukraine sounded the alarm in recent days, sharing intelligence and voicing dissatisfaction with what they see as a lack of urgency in the response from the U.S. and other Western countries.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 79 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Remember, if "the west" so much as sends letters of warm regard, let alone troops, to Ukraine, Russia will feel like that's justification for starting WW III. They can naturally do whatever they want, because Russia.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

Typical conservative values.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe, but there is very little chance of Putin launching nukes. Firstly because they likely haven't been serviced and many probably won't work, secondly because dictators tend to want legacies and Putin has children and grandchildren.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He don't care about his children or grandchildren, but what he do care about is his own life, so he won't be launching any nukes.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What makes you think he doesn't care about his legacy?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hmm fair point, IIRC he does have some son in politics quite high up.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Really, you don't have to love your son to want him to replace you. It's more about being You 2.0 than being someone you love. I doubt either of the successive Kims got much love from their fathers.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And Trump would appease the invaders. Shame.

[–] MonkeMischief 1 points 1 month ago

Or in his verbiage:

"SAD."

[–] irmoz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder how the tankies will try to spin this. Putin is as far from communist as a person can get. Surely the tankies won't continue to claim that NK is even remotely socialist.

[–] rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I interact with enough tankies to tell you in advance.

In the view of tankies, Russia isn't imperialist due to some weaseling with how they define imperialism in economic terms.

The US, on the other hand, is as imperialist in tankies' minds as it is in reality.

Thus, to to them, Russia is waging an anti-imperialist war with the long-term goal of establishing a "multi-polar" world.

Thus, the tankie conclusion is that NK is heroically sending in the soldiers to help fight imperialism.

I see no need to try and explain why this is wrong. That's left as an exercise for the reader.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Let's confirm it again next week, too.

[–] actually@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The western reaction is calm, considering, slightly curious and not urgent. The quotes show a lack of importance. It might as well be business as usual instead of a harbinger of wider war.

Disasters like this often have the same kind initial reactions in history

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

South korea is sending equipament and troops

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The malnourished, 1 ft shorter than their S. Korean counterpart troops?