this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
125 points (95.0% liked)

Science Memes

11068 readers
2999 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sunoc@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And I’m a fish. But that’s not very helpful.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No such things as trees either...

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the one that breaks my brain

[–] kbal@fedia.io 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Believing people who say that sort of thing about the meaning of perfectly cromulent words like "fish", "bird", and "berry" is like going to the butcher shop to learn about horsemanship.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, neither option is helpful.

I'm going with "dinosaurs are dinosaurs!"

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Now that's just silly.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Some dinosaurs were fish. Therefore you're a dinosaur.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Technically? All dinosaurs are fish. You are a fish. But you are not a dinosaur.

[–] UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

my dinosaur has feathers, does that help?

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Awww! That's a cute fish you got there!

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Behold! A man!

[–] BellaDonna@mujico.org 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait, but didn't a lot of them it turns out actually have feathers? Like regardless of taxonomy, with regards to phenotype, I thought we were able to inductively reason they had feathers ( possibly more like like down feathers ) and were even most closely related to birds.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, we have proof for quite a number and can conclude that there were even more, nobody really knows how many. Some go so far to speculate that all did.

I think the meme is that the guy on the right sees it with phylogenetic lense and would also include birds into the reptilian group. I'm more fan of saying there are no reptiles at all but both views are equally valid