this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
475 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2555 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

REDDING, Calif. - A former Redding landlord is in hot water today after recent Reddit posts he made were shared across the app.

Charles Pierce is a 70-year-old former landlord of the Manzanita Manor Apartments in Redding. Pierce says he was fired from his role after his reddit posts came to light.

Pierce told Action News Now that under a now-deleted account, he posted that he received mail-in ballots of four previous tenants at the Manzanita Manor Apartments.

In a post to Reddit, Pierce claimed that he used all of the four ballots to cast votes for former President Donald Trump, and to vote "no" on all rent control and school bond measures in Shasta County.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 219 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh look, yet again the supporters screaming the loudest about biggest fraud are the ones committing it.

Every accusation an admission of guilt.

[–] runjun@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

Part of the reason to drum it up is because it gives permission to the base to do it themselves. ‘We have to commit fraud because the democrats are committing fraud!’

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

the supporters screaming the loudest about biggest fraud are the ones committing it

Of course, MAGA Republicans are all about maximum projection since it works so well with the"poorly educated" morons.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 86 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 74 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Property manager, maybe? You don’t get fired from being a landlord, you sell the property.

He says the situation has been "blown out of proportion" and is "so bogus."

Is this what happened to Bill S. Preston, Esq.?

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

"this is non-non, non-non-non, NON-heinous!"

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Property manager is doing an awful lot more than just selling/renting out property.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 16 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, but in the end you're just an employee, you shouldn't really give a shit how much tenants pay, you're equally getting exploited by the actual landlord. It's just another case of someone thinking they're in a different class compared to the one they're actually in, and voting accordingly.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 13 points 3 weeks ago

And somehow didn't even own the building if he could be fired? So wasn't he really more of a building supervisor or something?

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 77 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Charles Pierce is a 70-year-old former landlord of the Manzanita Manor Apartments in Redding. Pierce says he was fired from his role after his reddit posts came to light.

I'm assuming he's the property manager (you can't fire a landlord). Some places give the property manager an apartment to live in, so he may have also lost his place to live. And at 70 years old, he's not going to have an easy time finding another job.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 25 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully he won't have to worry about a place to live, as the felonies he committed will get him a cushy cell, complete with a roommate!

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Either that or he had a separate job, and was just a landlord on the side.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 3 weeks ago

It’s super cool how the cheating comes from “inside the house.” Fucking hypocrites.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Mail in ballots require a valid signature to be counted and it has to match the voter registration.

But I suppose, if he had access to former resident lease paperwork, he could have forged the signatures, but now on top of voter fraud you're entering identity theft territory.

What the elections team needs to determine is a full accounting of which ballots were sent to the apartments and then cross reference that with current residents, and who returned ballots.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It’s kinda crazy to me that we still use signatures for official validation. I’m not saying I have a solution but it seems archaic

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 11 points 3 weeks ago

It's an interesting problem. How do you maintain the privacy of anonymous votes while ensuring the integrity of the larger process and all without making it too hard to vote that people don't have access?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, that's the way in person voting works too. You sign the voter registration check in and the signatures are compared.

[–] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And I'm always sweating bullets, because my signature is never the same...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Just like how you sign a credit card payment and those are always verified?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Those always pass verification, but I always read that in addition to the security theater they are likely to be looked at when there is fraud to help establish the scope

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, no, those are never verified!

I remember, years ago now, a comedian ran a bit about just how bad it had to get before a purchase was denied.

[–] Bananabird@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I remembered exactly what you are talking about. This was the closest thing I could find at a glance. Zug seems to have been archived on the Internet Archive so it may have the actual post on there. I also got a good laugh out of the p-p-p-PowerBook saga from SomethingAwful around the same time.

https://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news_columnists_ezorn/2009/08/put-your-shamu-on-the-bottom-line-and-join-the-revolution.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In a post to Reddit, Pierce claimed that he used all of the four ballots to cast votes for former President Donald Trump, and to vote "no" on all rent control and school bond measures in Shasta County.

But, Pierce says he didn't actually do what he posted.

In a statement, he said he "did not engage in any illegal activities", adding that his posts were hyperbole, and that he was "too good" at inflaming and angering his audience.

He says the situation has been "blown out of proportion" and is "so bogus."

So bogus. Wait, is that the word of the...

Trolling as a defense for admitting a major crime. So bogus.

Bogus.

So bogus.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 18 points 3 weeks ago

But... I was only pretending!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

And he just willingly told all of this to a news station?

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

"Mail in ballots are a huge source of voter fraud. I'd know, I just filled out and sent in four of them!"

[–] woodenskewer@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

He missed the part where you need a lot more money to be able to broadcast your crimes and get away with it.

[–] baru@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

He assumed the rules don't apply to him. Rules are for the people you don't like.

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, he's telling the news that he didn't actually do any of this, he was just trolling or whatever. And fair, nothing on the internet should be taken at face value, for exactly this kinda reason. They're gonna investigate and see if he actually did this or not.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Landlords can't be fired, they own the property. He worked for a landlord.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah more like a property manager.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't know you could fire your landlord.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He's not a landlord if he doesn't own the place, not in my book anyway.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 weeks ago

I would call him an ex-manager.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Landlords and being evil are an undefeated combo.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait, how do you fire a landlord? Did someone else have some kind of contract with them that allows them to take ownership of the property? Or is this guy more something like a property manager and not the actual landlord owning the place?

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I lost faith in whatever generated that article when it said the post was shared across the app, and not the site...

[–] subignition@fedia.io 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Vast majority of its users are using an app and not the desktop site, probably

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Reddit is a website, not a program. That's my issue. This is the same thinking that wifi=internet and it drives me insane.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I understand your frustration completely - I'm just saying there's nothing to be done about it. I've seen this happen when describing Lemmy too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

What happens if this didn't come out, and those 4 people also voted in person.

Then when votes are counted, it maybe comes out that they voted twice.

Now 4 different people get accused of fraud and they have to defend that they didn't do it, but they don't know who/how it happened?

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

The signatures on the mail-in votes wouldn't match what the state has on record (I doubt this 60 year old MAGAt is a master forger) and wouldn't be verified or recorded. Then elections officials might look at where these mail-in ballots were sent and MAGAt gets a visit from police for voter fraud anyway.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fucking Redding. I’m not even surprised. SoCal and NorCal are basically two different states.

[–] exothermic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Inland Empire, Bakersfield, and Orange County would like to have a word with you.

[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

I grew up behind the Orange Curtain and now live in the Inland Empire. Mercy kill please?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kintarian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Wow, a news article from where I live, that's pretty amazing.

load more comments
view more: next ›