this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
120 points (92.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7153 readers
209 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The prices are secondary. Why is there a shortage of housing?

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it depends on the place but one observation is to notice what builders are choosing to build. In my area at least the majority of new construction is either cramped subdivisions with $600K+ homes, luxury apartments, or 55+ maintenance provided housing. All of these categories are not what the general populace is looking for, especially first time buyers or new entrants to the market. But I'm guessing the margins on these properties and rentals are much higher.

I think developers don't want to waste their efforts on affordable rentals or starter homes. They have block of land X, so they figure they can get Y% more return by building properties with rents in the top quartile for the area.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. Now offer more land and the right to use prefabricated elements. Then somebody will figure out a way to create housing with low margins.

[–] spudwart@spudwart.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Affordable housing can be built in new areas connected by public transport. Nimbys cannot have a majority everywhere.

[–] asteroidnova@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are the ones who vote. They don't need a majority. They need a majority of voters. They seem to have it. I think we're learning that we have the country that we want more and more everyday. We don't want better, we want this.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or renters could organize and motivate the nonvoters to vote after they have clarified which party is willing to implement the necessary changes.

[–] asteroidnova@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hard to do when everyone views renters as parasitic children.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

35% renters is not a guaranteed win for a new party. But in a two party election, they decide the winner. That's a foundation for starting a negotiation.

[–] tallwookie@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

eh... wait long enough and the real estate bubble will pop - driving down prices.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe for a few years, it took about 7 years for almost all the country to get back above 2008 prices.

[–] tallwookie@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

yep. a few years is all most folks need - those that could afford to own real estate (not just purchasing, but the upkeep of and ability to pay taxes on).