this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
180 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5613 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Well that's just more proof that it's all rigged!"

  • Some Trumper
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, to them everything is

[–] subignition@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

I mean, they're used to mostly only getting their way when they cheat.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Here are the numbers: https://www.georgiavotes.com/

I like that it's overall mostly women by a large spread, I don't like that the non-voters leans towards men. Non-voting dude-bros were a target Trump constituency.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

New voters usually indicate Harris voters. I don't believe Trump, who is known, would draw that many new voters, and half a million is a big number.

[–] zib@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

This is probably the most hopeful comment I've read in the past two weeks, so thank you for that. I really hope this is the case.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Still leaning women on the non-voters by 50k

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I misread the % as being column, not row, associated. Thank you.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A few things to keep in mind.

  • Georgia is a battleground state.
  • When the GOP isn't putting up literal pedophiles and football players with lots of CTE and no political experience, Georgia tends to vote pretty deep red. At least, deep enough where they're normally considered safe Republican.
  • Georgia is home to Margorie Taylor Greene, who holds a very safe seat in Georgia despite being absolutely batshit crazy.
  • The current mail-in counts skew noticeably towards women, who currently are nationally favoring Trump by about 3 points.
  • The Hispanic population of Georgia has also grown by several thousand people in the past two years, and Trump has managed to erase the lead among Hispanic voters that Democrats normally rely on.

The fact that mail-in voting has spiked so heavily in Georgia may not be the saving grace Democrats think it is.

Here's the way I look at it.

I don't consider North Carolina and Georgia battleground states. Those are probably going to go pretty decisively to Trump. There's a lot of fuckery going around in Arizona which gets me to believe that Arizona will go to Trump as well. I think Nevada will ultimately be irrelevant. Harris needs to pick up Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and either Michigan or flip Arizona to win. I think that's her only path.

  • I believe Wisconsin and Michigan will go to Democrats
  • Trump absolutely will challenge Pennsylvania if he doesn't win. And with the recent headlines, it's not the desperate grasping at straws that Trump was doing in 2020. At least in the forum of public opinion, he'll have a case. He also knows that the court system has historically largely deferred to Trump, either out of party loyalty or fear of retribution, and that the Supreme Court has all but announced they're ready to anoint him as king, and in the case of a contested election, rules set forth by the Constitution heavily favor Trump.

This election is not going to be pretty. Remember that we have nearly 50% of the voting public who are seeing Trump's rise to facist power and are actively saying "Yes, we know he's a bigoted facist. We want it that way." And they've already proven that if they can't get there legitimately, they will resort to cheating. And if that doesn't work, they'll just threaten violence until a judge rules in Trump's favor out of fear for his life.

Never underestimate the appeal of a strongman dictator who promises that he's willing to solve all of your problems by going after "them". That is a very strong motivator for a lot of people.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"We need people who think quick and people who are willing to lead - he’s a leader," said Alomia, 42

That a Hispanic dude from the article you posted.

That guy is a fucking moron if he thinks Trump "thinks quick and is a leader" unfortunately morons vote.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Pretty much every Trump supporter bite I've seen is the same: "The man has confidence. That's what we need, a confidence man."

Leading and "You're doing this or you're fucked" aren't quite the same, but I'm pretty sure his supporters don't know the difference.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I guess I'll just forget that Georgia has two Democratic Senators

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Because the Republicans put up a pedophile and a football player with CTE. And they still almost won.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I commend the effort and the long post to explain yourself, but it's ultimately conjecture. None of the battleground states will go "decisively" to any of the candidates.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I commend the effort and the long post to explain yourself, but it’s ultimately conjecture. None of the battleground states will go “decisively” to any of the candidates.

I guess we'll see in a week. But I have trouble believing that a state that has voted deep red for over 3 decades except for the cases where the GOP has put up a literal pedophile and a football player with advanced dementia is suddenly going to vote for a black female democrat. I just don't see it. And keep in mind. The pedo and dementia patient almost won. I'd be very surprised if the split is anything less than a 55/45 split in Trump's favor.

Similar for NC. A GOP supermajority in the state legislature, a MAGA suck-up in Graham for a senator in a seat that's very safe for him. Yeah, they've got a Democrat governor, but Massachusetts has voted almost exclusively Republican governors for over 30 years now (With the exception of the current governor and one former governor). And they are as deep blue as you could possibly get, so the choice of governor really doesn't make much of a difference. Their overall voting is very deep red, and I expect that to be reflected in the election.

And for the record, I'd love nothing more to be completely wrong on both of them. But I am also acknowledging the reality of the situation and am not going to hold my breath in anticipation.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

The ATL area is carrying the state of Georgia now. That's what has changed over the past three decades. The GOP has a hard time in any state where there's a large dominant urban area. That's not really a new thing.

Atlanta Journal-Constitution - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Wikipedia search about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.ajc.com/politics/early-voters-georgia-2024-over-half-million-of-early-voters-this-year-didnt-vote-in-2020/3GEPA56CEZDXTI5J7CYHNS7GAU/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support