267
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps gave the final go-ahead last Monday in Beirut

Iranian security officials helped plan Hamas’s Saturday surprise attack on Israel and gave the green light for the assault at a meeting in Beirut last Monday, according to senior members of Hamas and Hezbollah, another Iran-backed militant group.

Officers of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had worked with Hamas since August to devise the air, land and sea incursions—the most significant breach of Israel’s borders since the 1973 Yom Kippur War—those people said.

Details of the operation were refined during several meetings in Beirut attended by IRGC officers and representatives of four Iran-backed militant groups, including Hamas, which holds power in Gaza, and Hezbollah, a Shiite militant group and political faction in Lebanon, they said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bloopernova@programming.dev 90 points 8 months ago

I have nothing but a gut feeling to back this up, but isn't this oh so convenient for russia? Now the very powerful USA Israel lobby will be asking for as much aid as possible.

I wouldn't be surprised if russia was behind this and other escalations.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 46 points 8 months ago

It might disrupt US focus a little, but Israel's military really doesn't need help on this. Israel is heavily militarized with a very advanced domestic defense industry. And as much as Russia has flopped, they're still a former superpower while Hamas is DIYing half their equipment

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Logic doesn't compute for Putin.

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

does not computin

[-] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

It is. They also were very, very quick to point out that „the west“ is at fault for supporting Ukraine too much and therefore Israel not enough.

[-] tallwookie@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago

the US can easily fund the war against Russian aggression as well as the war to save Israel - the US is #1 economy

[-] protist@mander.xyz 20 points 8 months ago

This does not account for US domestic politics though. Now, Republicans who have been pro-Russia and anti-Ukraine aid will be screaming from the rooftops about how that money should have all gone to Israel instead. They started blaming Biden for this the day it happened, meanwhile not a peep about Netanyahu

[-] tallwookie@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

yeah. "can" and "will" are two separate things

[-] protist@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

You are correct

[-] rastilin@kbin.social 19 points 8 months ago

I think I saw Russia's name before, so it's not just you wondering about that. It would be completely unsurprising to find out that Russia is giving a push to plans that had been mothballed for a while.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I actually think it’s better for russia to fracture the democrats over it. Stop the genocide b/w support Israel. That’s the spin they’re expecting, and have already started to see dividends from that in the press.

The curse of over-simplifying is the only winner in any of that messaging. Keep the discussions long, detailed and boring. Ignore the blaring “dems in disarray” messaging they’ve already got chambered for next week.

[-] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think if they were involved it will backfire on them. The reality is it is now going to be a lot easier, and the military-industrial complex is extremely eager, to put aid for Israel as a joint package in aid with Ukraine. Net result may be that aid is enhanced for both nations.

Edit: that said they do want Iranian drones. I could see them supporting it from that perspective and also happy to run their misinformation campaigns for them to dry and drive a wedge.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

It's not like we really have a budget to hit, we can just fund both. If anything, Republicans in the House who are arguing that we need to spend the money here instead of on military aid will lose that talking point if they vote for Israeli aid. And the Senate who wants Ukrainian money can tie the two together to force more money to Ukraine.

Not that it can't be Russian-encouraged, they probably do want the US preoccupied somewhere else, but Hamas has their own reasons for launching the attack, not everything has to be about the United States.

[-] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Israel's been neutral in the Ukraine conflict. I doubt Russia would seriously risk turning Israel.

And even then, if Russia wanted to do something theyd do it through Syria, not Gaza.

At the very least this maybe could be a diversion to get eyes off Ukraine but I seriously doubt that. Hamas is probably just pissed off Saudi/Israeli relations have been improving and want to stop that.

Russia really isn't some illuminati spymaster country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Coldgoron@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well considering they're Iran's biggest ally and Iran wants nothing less than total destruction of State of Israel and slaughtering of all the Jews...

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

It's not as simple as that.

Iran fucks with Israel, because Israel fucks with Iran. And they've both been at it since 1979.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-30/how-israel-and-iran-attack-each-other-while-avoiding-all-out-war

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-56724039

The religious aspect is just icing on the cake to the geopolitical tensions.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] i2ndshenanigans@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Who are these senior members of Hamas and Hezbollah that said this? Sounds to me like the article is just war mongering for Israeli attacks on Iran with justifications based on he said she said bullshit with no actual evidence of it. Also article is paywalled.

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 46 points 8 months ago

Ghazi Hamad, a Hamas spokesman, meanwhile told the BBC that the group had direct backing for the attack from Iran.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67044182

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

And que World War 3 ladies and gentlemen. Buckle up, because this is gonna get messy.

[-] dannoffs@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 8 months ago

As a millennial I'm excited to live through my like 5th WW3.

[-] MetalJewSolid@sopuli.xyz 17 points 8 months ago

Seriously, every single local war is a fresh breeding ground for WW3 according to morons online

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

A guy bumped into me at the pub. I fear this could escalate to WW3.1+ PRO MAX

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

As a GenX-er, I grew up with WW3 as a constant possibility. My third grade teacher showed us a TV movie about nuclear war that had me thinking every plane that flew overhead was a nuclear missile.

Maybe this is why GenX is the "whatever" generation. When you grow up thinking you're going to die at any moment, you tend to shrug off a lot of stuff.

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Doom-mongering. Climate change would still do more damage than WW3 unfortunately.

[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Let's just wait for the Taiwan invasion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] bloopernova@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago

Fucking great. I hope cooler heads can prevail.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

When both sides of a conflict make the claim that the same piece of dirt is sacred to their religion, it's unlikely for cooler heads to get a word in edgeways.

[-] Gargleblaster@kbin.social 21 points 8 months ago

Well, there's also the fact that after WWII, while the Allies were dividing the world up like a giant birthday cake, they created most of these problems: North Korea, Iraq-Kuwait, and plunking a new Jewish country down in the middle of Arabia.

If the Allies had decided that Ohio is a new Jewish country, what would've been the fallout from that?

As much as we seem a step removed from this issue, we made the problem.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago
[-] wolf6152@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

May the coming nuclear war wipe all forms of religion from the face of the earth. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

So we can finally see peace on this planet 🙏🙏🙏🙏

[-] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

As much as I agree, that religion makes people do stupid/dangerous/horrible things, both of the world wars were not started for religious reasons. So maybe, there are more things that make people hate each other than just religion.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Religion is seldom the initial cause of wars, but it is almost always used as a tool to motivate and drag the population along with the war effort.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
267 points (92.4% liked)

News

21687 readers
3600 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS