this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
104 points (87.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

36978 readers
345 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

See, I've been reading Common Sense by Thomas Paine, and it's perfect example of something impossible today.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There was never a point in time where a single person could change even the majority of people's opinions.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Most change happened with 20% supporting, 20% opposing, and the rest not giving a shit and waiting to get behind whomever wins

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 36 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Was there ever a time that this was the case?

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure the Catholic Church would agree that Martin Luther changed everyone's opinion.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

It certainly changed their opinion of him

[–] iii@mander.xyz -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm not sure the whole arab or asian world would agree. They're still colonizing africa.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee -5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

MLK definitely did not change everyone's opinion. A lot of people? Sure. Everyone? Absolutely not.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I said Martin Luther, not Martin Luther King

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ah that's my bad. My point still stands though. It's not like he was able to convince everyone to become Protestant.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But everyone’s opinion was changed.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That was not a criterion of OP’s question. As such, it doesn’t really matter. Just that they were changed is the qualifier here.

If I were to guess, it at least changed their opinion of Martin Luther, even if they didn’t become protestants.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Yes.

The Pope has that power. Pretty much always has, but it was far more pronounced before universal literacy was a thing.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know that a screenshot of twitter is proof of anything, especially after the proliferation of AI.

But, go read about the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages. Even if I'm wrong in my opinion, you'll learn some new things.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 10 months ago

Honestly I think it is wrong to compare modern day to anything over a few decades old. You can't hold Catholics responsible for things that happened centuries ago. You can only hold them to the now.

Also not all Catholics believe the same things.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

No pope has ever had the power to change everyone's mind with a single word or speech. That's never been a thing.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago

Thomas payne's common sense didn't change everyone's mind.

and there are people today influencing how everybody thinks with tweets and memes.

language and information is evolving, and that is absolutely changing the landscape of how public opinion is affected.

Gaza is a great example.

Israeli has been bombing hospitals and schools and extrajudicially executing Palestinians for 50 years, but now that people can see that information and hear testimony from Palestinian journalists directly, they care.

[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 months ago

Hype still sells and we still idolize people though. Businessmen such as Steve Jobs or (early) Elon Musk curate an image of themselves as a "genius", which leads to popularity of their products and influences trends and opinions in specific fields.

Really though, no single person did or invented anything alone. Every well-known and highly regarded scientist, inventor, or businessman built their work as a small increment on top of hundreds of predecessors. The Upright Thinkers by Leonard Mlodinow is a good pop-sci book that carries that point throughout.

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Eh. One person could be influencing in the recent past…

Walter Cronkite, declared the Vietnam war unwinnable and “people “ say that changed Americans view on it.

Today, I agree there are too many voices and too many people have their “own realities” for one person to affect the national discourse.

I don’t think is aliens landed the majority of Americans would believe their own eyes if their news said it was fake.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Idk. Some kids in Enders game were able to do it

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, and that's an extremely unrealistic science fiction book.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ValiantDust@feddit.org 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you two telling me getting into political arguments on internet forums is not gonna make me the ruler of the world??? I thought I was really getting somewhere here.

(Relevant xkcd)

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I get into political arguments on the internet all the time, and nobody cares. Enders Game definitely lied to me about how the world works.

[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 7 points 10 months ago

Seems a bit of an exaggeration to say everyone. The population at the time of the revolution was around 2.5 million. Of that maybe 500,000 were the land owning white male "patriots" that would support the revolution and of those maybe half read or were influenced by Thomas Payne so around 250,000. We tend to attach a lot of significance after the fact to the American revolution, and Adam's, Payne etc. Since it spawned one of the greatest empires the world has ever known but at the time it was a relatively minor tax revolt.

this isn't even a matter of the world in general was smaller back then, France at that time had a population of 28 million. Payne would go on to have less success in convincing everyone there on his ideas because the scale is just so much more massive. Same with modern day.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well good thing we have massive, well funded media campaigns!!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

...aimed to create tension by creating artificial divides powered by half truths and all out lies.

What a time to be alive

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 3 points 10 months ago

Well, for the good, it's a hard get these days, but for the bad, all one has to do is look at Donald Trump as the lightning rod to finally push through Republican Southern Strategy 60 years after they first foisted it on the body politic

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Too bad more people didn't have their minds changed by Paine's "Agrarian Justice". What a banger.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You are intense and insane

Edit: since people didn't get the reference, op used the lyric from the song the Schuyler sisters from Hamilton which this is a reference to.

[–] nalinna@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml -4 points 10 months ago

Who the haail, is Thomas Payne? Max Payne's older brother?