this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
204 points (98.1% liked)

World News

273 readers
392 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
Deceptichum@quokk.au
Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
204
UN should consider suspending Israel over ‘genocide’ against Palestinians, says special rapporteur (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 week ago by SalaciousBCrumb@lemy.lol to c/world@quokk.au
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“It is time to consider suspending the credentials of Israel as a member state of the UN,” she said. “I understand the sensitivity because none of you have clean hands when it comes to human rights.”

She said no other country had defied so many UN resolutions for so long.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] subignition@fedia.io 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the US ambassador to the UN, described her in a tweet as unfit for office, adding: “The United Nations should not tolerate antisemitism from a UN-affiliated official hired to promote human rights.”

I'm so fucking tired of this conflation of condemnation of the Israeli government with bigotry against the Jewish people.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Im tired of attempting to differentiate Israel from Judaism and Jewish People leading to immediate accusations of antisemitism for doing so.

Israel clearly doesn't care that they're actively destroying the global image of Judaism and Jewish People by actively pushing back against that differentiation in media.

[–] PlasticLove 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Israel loves it.

The more harm international Jewish people are in, the more they can import colonizers and pretend the world is against them to justify their evil.

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Makes sense to me. What's the use of have a member in an organization when can't follow the rules set by said org?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't matter, America will veto it

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

First kick the US then Israel lmao i wish

[–] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 3 points 1 week ago

There might be ways around that though.

Consider that when https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United/_Nations/_General/_Assembly/_Resolution/2758/(XXVI originally passed, for example, the US was not able to veto this.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

There should be sanctions but kicking them out of the UN won't accomplish anything positive. The UN is supposed to be the one place where countries that don't like each other can come to diplomatic agreements to not kill each other.

There are loads of bad countries that piss on human rights in the UN but kicking them out isn't a solution.