I haven't been playing competitive FPS games for a long time, but they used to be a dime a dozen. There must be some kind of alternative multiplayer FPS that you could just play instead if you're not happy with Call of Duty.
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
104 points (98.1% liked)
Games
16742 readers
705 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I am hoping modern games get so bad people finally start having halo 2 lan parties again.
I know some people kinda liked that XDefiant game, or The Finals
Seeing all the stupid skins running around is part of what soured me on PlanetSide 2.
The crazy part isn't that people want to be able to disable that. The crazy part is that they want to pay to disable them...
No you guys, that should just be an option, no questions asked. Included in the options menu for... Well, whatever the asking price of the base game is. Also known as included in the base game.
Today’s consumers for ya.
The word consumer is so demeaning... But yes.
Humans are actually the only real producers in the world if you think about it. Everything around you is built by other humans.
We rarely think about that.
The word consumer is so demeaning
It should be, and it is accurate in this case.
The word consumer is so demeaning...
I doubt they were trying to be complimentary.
I really dislike being reductive so take what I say with a grain of salt:
I am not surprised that the people who regularly buy the COD series with all of it's monetary practices for the past decade are asking to buy a feature. They'd be more shocked if you could features/updates/qol without buying it. Habituation, de-sensitisation, whatever - they're the whales that fuel the decline in AAA games.
People are offering to pay for it because they understand that providing that feature would potentially cause lost revenue for Call of Duty, since (theoretically) players are buying skins so other players can see them.
I imagine there are a lot of potential solutions (I can think of a few at least) but Activision probably think the lowest risk is to do nothing.
Next year: pay to cut an opponent's frame rate in half, as a bidding system. Whoever is offering the least premium coin gets the debuff.
Then don’t play the game. Cosmetics like that are essentially CoD’s bread and butter, and have been for decades. I don’t disagree that it’s gotten WAY out of hand, but that’s also why I don’t play COD anymore.
I don't think you know what "decades" means.
50,000 people used to live here, now it's a ghost town...
5 Nov 2007
Didn't have skins except for on the weapons, and you had to earn those. One of the first games ever with selectable perks. It was such a breath of fresh air after years of World War 2 games. World at War afterwards was the first one with zombies though, and it had tanks in the big multi player maps. It was only 17 years ago... video games were amazing. I stopped playing after the first black ops. It is just like any other EA sports franchise.
You're asking the average cod player to stop playing? They are unable to. It's the reason why the series is where it is, its playerbase is... not the smartest.