this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
149 points (98.7% liked)

News

23353 readers
3128 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Since it was proposed by the Texas Education Agency earlier this year, the elementary school reading and language arts curriculum has faced strong opposition from parents, advocates and faith leaders for its heavy use of biblical teachings, which critics say could lead to the bullying and isolation of non-Christian students, undermine church-state separation and grant the state far-reaching control over how children learn about religion.

A second grade lesson called “Fighting for a Cause” notes that “slavery was wrong, but it was practiced in most nations throughout history.” It does not detail the race-based nature of slavery in America that made it distinct from other parts of the world.

Another second grade lesson covering the U.S. Civil War focuses heavily on Robert E. Lee’s “excellent abilities” as general of the Confederate Army, which fought to maintain slavery, and his desire to find “a peaceful way to end the disagreement” with the North. It does not teach that Lee enslaved people or highlight his racist views that Black people were neither intelligent nor qualified to hold political power.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 25 points 3 days ago

I just skip stories like this now, because they’re depressing. Plus, in a couple months, it’s only going to get worse.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How do they teach the US emerging as a world power? I can kind of imagine them saying it just happened because they’re cleverer and harder working.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They have been saying that for decades. American exceptionalism and all that.

[–] zelifcam@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I went to top schools in wealthy suburbs my entire childhood in blue neighborhoods in blue states, and we were taught American exceptionalism and the strength of our adherence to capitalism was what built the country, as well as what defeated communism. Slavery was a problem but it was gone now and things were fine, especially since the civil rights movement.

It wasn't all framed quite that simply, but they were the obvious takeaways. I didn't even realize it until I started devouring history books in my adult life. We learned an accepted view of history, but the arguments for why those things happened and their impacts were wildly disparate from what I (on the basis of what seems to be the historical consensus today) believe is realistic.

[–] zelifcam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Everybody's letting their Nazi flag fly high now, I see.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I saw this comment in my notifications and I thought that it was responding to another post about a literal Nazi flag flying 😬

[–] spacecadet@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it does not derail the race based slaveryn in America that made it distinct from the rest of the world

This blogger can’t be this dumb, the derivation of slave comes from Slav because of the Muslim enslavement, specifically of whites.

Arabs continued the slave trade long after it was outlawed and still do race based slavery to this day. I don’t agree with downplaying it, but at least teach it accurately.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What blogger are you talking about?

This is printed in an exceptionally well regarded and award-winning newspaper by a journalist with a master's in investigative journalism from Columbia University.

Edit: You've now made clear that your only agenda is to discredit a story that makes you uncomfortable. You are willing to embarass yourself to do so, but I have no interest in indulging you.

[–] spacecadet@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

Apparently didn’t investigate enough. In high school I had a teacher that had a masters from Columbia and was a total moron. Made me realize that maybe Ivy League is more about who can afford it than brains. Also, journalism isn’t a history degree and it shows. You ever wonder why the best authors on historical topics all come out of Britain and have history degrees? Is well known that American “historians” post 1985 are all trash because they are journalists and not historians.

We need to stop being like “they went to Ivy League so they must be smart!” The most brilliant people I work with went to state schools and I work at a very recognizable tech company.

Don't they have to teach why slavery was good in Florida too? When do we stop letting this qualify as an education?

[–] tal -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Robert E. Lee’s “excellent abilities” as general of the Confederate Army

Lee did do very well. Civil War history isn't specifically my area of interest, but I don't think that there's another high-ranking commander who one could reasonably say used his forces more effectively in the war. He had a heavily-winning record while fighting larger forces that were better-equipped.

He was also highly-regarded in his time; he was offered command of the Union Army, and commanded the most-important Confederate military formation for much of the war.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You've either completely missed the point or are running for a Texas GOP seat. Maybe both.

[–] tal -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What do you think the point is?

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's pretty clear from the article, as well as the excerpt above. The curriculum is teaching about a history that is closely intertwined with slavery while avoiding mention of slavery. No one is contending the military expertise of Lee; teaching about his life and political legacy while expunging his racist motives is dishonest.