Unfortunately it simply does not matter. They are absolutely above the law, we can’t even force a code of ethics onto them. They are kings who control what insanity the sitting president can get away with while taking open bribes/quid pro quo
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
321 points (99.4% liked)
politics
19237 readers
2539 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Dem committees have an uncanny knack for confirming what everyone has known for a year and a half and then doing effectively nothing about it.
Still faster than the Garland DOJ, though.
This headline could run every week until he dies and still be a different article and case.
And every week fuck-all would be done about it.
The sad truth
Yeah, we know.
Problem is that voters showed up last month and said "Yes, we'd like more of that please.", so good luck with trying to get anything to change.
And nothing will change and he will continue to be the same hypocritical piece of shit that he always is...
Face it, justice is DEAD in America.
Yeah, because the other Republicans are protecting him
Even most Democrats are protecting him. They've done nothing.
They're not just protecting him, they're protecting themselves. If Clarence Thomas has to disclose his trips, so should they.
In my opinion, everything should be transparent for public servants—every penny received, every vote cast. If you want people to trust you, your actions need to be open and clear. When someone rushes to defend Thomas or any public figure in a similar position, my first thought is: What are they trying to hide? Ethics shouldn't be optional. You weren't elected because you’re cool and people liked you—you were elected to serve and represent the people. Unfortunately, it seems many elected officials have forgotten that. Those who've been in office too long have likely forgotten it entirely.
It's time to remind them. If they won't pass term limits, we can enforce them by not re-electing those who fail to live up to their promises. If an official doesn't follow through on their campaign pledges, we need to vote them out. It's time for Americans to take this country back. We need to stop letting the two-party system distract us. Let's break free from the stranglehold of the Democratic and Republican parties and focus on a system where people come first and politicians are held accountable to the public, not the other way around.
They should have to wear body cams so we can see their dinner conversations with lobbyists. All body cam data is livestreamed and saved for citizens to view. The only time they get to disable it is to go to the bathroom and when they go home to their family at night.
They shouldn't be allowed personal devices for communications, instead being forced to use government-provided devices that also track and post everything they do on their device to the public internet for the voters to see.
If we're in a democracy and we've voted to entrust you with the safeguarding of our democracy, you deserve more public scrutiny, not less.
If they wanted a world where we didn't feel like we had to do this to our representatives, maybe they shouldn't have thrown all those years of norms and decorum and gentlemans handshakes out the fucking window three decades ago. Maybe if they were operating in good faith we wouldn't feel the need to demand every sliver of their lives to prove they're actually working for the people.
they get to spy on us. if they don't like being held accountable, they should dismantle the surveillance state
How many vacations does this guy take?
There's a fair bit of opportunity to slack off when you have a lifetime appointment and feel like doing that
A Term of the Supreme Court begins, by statute, on the first Monday in October. Usually Court sessions continue until late June or early July. The Term is divided between “sittings,” when the Justices hear cases and deliver opinions, and intervening “recesses,” when they consider the business before the Court and write opinions. Sittings and recesses alternate at approximately two-week intervals.
This is a great comment. Knowing how they work is important. Thank you.