this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
274 points (99.6% liked)

politics

18977 readers
3743 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dlg@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Y'all going to be real pissed off again.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm gonna be pissed off having to vote for Biden. I hate the two party system.

[–] cpo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Dutchie here. Not a fan of the multiparty system either. Anyone who hits the news (be it positive or negative) can start their own party if they get the number of party members required.

Result: we had to enlarge our voting billets.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As an European can you explain what's so wrong about him? So many laws have been blocked by the opposition.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With Biden? He's a capitalist with the wrong priorities. He's approved more new oil drilling than anyone else in recent memory, for example. If you're European, you would probably consider him center-right, and I don't believe that's the right direction for America. We need stronger social safety nets, better education, and really need to invest in Americans again.

Don't get me wrong, he's done a lot of good. He really has. But if we had ranked choice voting in this country, he absolutely would not have won. He does not represent most of us. But he represents most of us better than the other guy.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Center-right is what's currently governing my country, so an absolutely cannot place him there.

I should have probably specified better, don't know why I just said European. I am from Italy, we have "the protector of the traditional family values" in power and two days ago she slashed welfare and a month ago invalidated some birth certificates of children from same-sex parents.

Oil rigs are definitely something you don't hear about unless you live there, I understand. Wasn't clean energy an objective of him?

[–] Elderos@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

It is a matter of perspective but center-right generally means some forms of welfare and capitalist regulations are still encouraged for very obvious cases, like anti-monopoly laws and basic healthcare.

What you're describing sounds more like plain right-wing. no welfare programs of any kind, invalidating progressive policies instead of maintaining status quo.

Biden made his whole career about cutting welfare programs and helping big corpos. He has shifted center in his former years, in part because the Democratic party now basically emcompass 75% of the political spectrum, since the GOP is now far-right, and everything left of that has to be absorbed by the democrats.

Biden is making decent compromise, thanks to his legacy with Obama and members of the party like Bernie and AOC, but he is way too moderate to enact the solutions that the country needs, imo.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's been a talking point since I was a fresh face high schooler over 30 years ago. It's been acted on only in very minor ways in that time. Nothing approaching what actually needed to be done.

[–] TheBaldFox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'll be voting for Cornel West. You could, too!

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately splitting the vote on the left is not the way avoid Trump further fucking up the country

[–] TheBaldFox@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If everyone that says they hated the two party system would actually vote third party then we'd actually have a third party.

Biden doesn't deserve my vote and I live in a red state. I'd vote for Cornel West even if I lived in a purple state, however, because I'm done propping up the least worst candidates.

Nether the dems not the republicans represent the working class and they can all get fucked.

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 22 points 1 year ago

I get where you're coming from, but a historic election like this is probably not the one for that action. It's not run-of-the-mill "historic", either.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, but lesser of two evils and all that. I’m Canadian so I don’t vote for either.

We have our own FPTP problems, but at least with a huge section of the country (Quebec) always voting in their federal party it allows room for the NDP in the rest of Canada.

Fuckin’ Trudeau ran on election reform then dropped it and legalized weed. So I have mixed feelings about the guy.

[–] Blastasaurus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Voting for the lesser of two evils is how Trudeau got into power.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

That’s always how it is in a FPTP system. It was always going to be either the Conservatives or Liberals and the Conservatives keep offering laughably bad candidates. Although, as both those parties shift further right the NDP may have a chance in the distant future.

All I’m saying is at least there’s room for other parties thanks to Quebec’s stubbornness. (I mean that in the most loving way)

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

No, we'd have a new second party. And that party wouldn't win against Republicans.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah I tossed my vote in the trash in 2016 like a fucking moron and I’ll never do that agin.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So you want a Trump presidency. Why?

[–] itsJoelle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Do you, but appealing to idealism instead of staving off fascism is bad praxis.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Why, you think he's going to win?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

It would be consistent with him getting away with all of the other obviously blatant shit he has done before.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mid term election should have been a right wing blow out and it wasn't, that's pretty foreboding for Trump

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's certainly a way to look at it. Not wrong either.

[–] Mookulator@wirebase.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty par for the economist. Not the same take as every other news outlet, not exactly the take I agree with on all points, but not totally wrong either.

[–] Lammy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We also get to see how badly he loses the popular vote.

[–] Lammy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Currently looks unlikely 😓

[–] elliothtz@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The main problem with that analogy is that juries hear all the evidence before making their decision.

But MAGA voters will never hear the facts on these cases, because they live exclusively in a media bubble that feeds them lies and truly moronic conspiracy theories.

This country is not okay.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The main problem with that analogy is that juries hear all the evidence before making their decision.

No. They are SUPPOSED to hear all the evidence. Reality and expectation are different things.

Voters are supposed to hear all of the facts. But reality and expectation are different things.

The analogy works great.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[–] kingthrillgore@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago
[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Article is paywalled after two paragraphs

[–] Llcooljessie@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The Economist always has one eye on the bottom line.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Mookulator@wirebase.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Link is still dead or dead again homie.

[–] Mookulator@wirebase.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

(read to the tune of The Pink Panther)

load more comments
view more: next ›