this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
117 points (94.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
656 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I understand that sharing video, photos, documents etc. is relatively safe because the data is not executed in the processor as instructions. How come people are willing to download and install pirated software though? How can one be confident that it does not contain malicious addons? Are people just don't know the risks? Or are there protection mechanisms that I am missing? I mean since the software is usually cracked there is not much use in comparing checksums with the originals, is it?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Make a dedicated user on your machine for pirated software. Never give that user root. Should contain it.

[–] Micromot@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago
[–] nestEggParrot@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't most sw need admin to insgall anyways? How would that help prevent embedded malware?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah checksums are useless. But if you know assembly, you could diff the original binary with the crack and look for anything malicious.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›