this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
195 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4022 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

But, as another article looking at the same poll notes, "almost three-quarters of Republicans (72%) said the economy should be given priority, even at the risk of ignoring climate change. That is up 13 points since 2018 – despite the increases in climate-change-related weather disasters."

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnowboardBum@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

WSJ had an Opinion piece out today about how "The Left" is still trying to make people panic about climate change. These fucking people.

Edit: Source - https://mastodon.social/@farhanasultana/110821905093491094

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Infuriating, but not surprising. They're convinced the consequences of it are only going to hit poor and non-white people in the global south, and they don't see them suffering and dying en masse as anything worth panicking about because they're genocidal shitheads.

[–] Skepticpunk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Those damn liberals, making people go outside.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What passes me off the most is we went from "climate change is not real" to "there's nothing we can do to stop it" real quick. For fuck sake, what do we need to do to get someone to take this shit seriously enough to do something meaningful.

And dont say voting, because while that may be the best thing to do it doesn't do it quick enough.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Start organizing your community! Fight against minimum parking requirements and single family zoning, protest against expanding or creating roads for cars instead of people, organize to make utilities like electricity municipal, fight against plastic-bag-ban bans, pressure your local government to make the neighborhood walkable, overrun a coal plant to shut it down, lobby the city to ban the installation of gas lines in new homes, organize a climate protest in front of the mayor's office, etc.

It all starts locally and builds up from there. That's how we see change, from the bottom to the top. A popular chant on picket lines is "I believe that we will win". We will win. We have to win. And we don't win unless we fight, because when we fight, we win.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

overrun a coal plant to shut it down

I love how you dropped this unfathomably based suggestion in a list of lame and ineffective ideas. I pick this one because it seems easier than dealing with the government.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can't rule out the fun options 😉

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Nothing mother nature isn't willing to do herself.

[–] jabeez@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

get someone to take this shit seriously enough to do something meaningful

Something meaningful might affect them, which is unacceptable, cuz this is 'Merica, which means they do what they want, fuck everyone else around them and even the entire planet!

[–] Skepticpunk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like the best course of action is only worth it to pursue if you don't care about things like "having an intact national energy grid".

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Reminder: If you aren't fighting conservatism, you aren't fighting climate change.

As long as conservatives have any say in the matter, climate change can never be addressed. Conservatives must be marginalized or we will suffer increasingly deadly consequences.

Conservatives (including neo-liberals) only serve corporations and will gleefully kill us all with their greed and profound unintelligence.

Do your part by disowning conservatives in your daily life. It is never appropriate to do business or keep relationships with conservatives.

[–] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yes because deepening the divide between political groups is the way to go.

Liberals: I'm better than you because I believe...

Conservatives: No, I'm better than you because I believe this...

And you know what? Nothing gets done and we're stuck in an ever worsening situation. I'd be happy to discuss solutions.

[–] jupiter_jazz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Man it's so depressing :/

[–] style99@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

59 percent of women said that climate change is currently causing a serious impact, compared to 49 percent of men.

Climate change denial isn't an issue with reason, it's more of a culture war. Part of the problem here is clearly toxic masculinity.

[–] SuperSleuth@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Climate change is hitting close to home for nearly 2 out of 3 of the 1,285 people surveyed

Or

Climate change is hitting close to home for nearly 2 out of 3 people surveyed

Those are much more honest titles. I refuse to support media outlets that use tactics like this and I'll call it out every time.