this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
86 points (98.9% liked)

news

23810 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I miss proofreaders. Why is it my fucking job?...

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is asking Congress to investigate the Trump administration’s plans for “imminent mass layoffs” of as many as 200,000 employees hired within the last two years ~~ago~~.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 55 points 5 days ago (2 children)

He's so fucking lucky that we don't have an organized left in this country

[–] jack@hexbear.net 58 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Mao said that it took the CPC longer to get to 10,000 members than it did from 10,000 to a million. And you wouldn't believe what PSL membership is looking like these days.

When the conditions are right, a small, well prepared organization can make a very large and powerful revolutionary movement very quickly.

[–] SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They were also working in a country with an actual proletariat class is the thing.

[–] Terrarium@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago

In the conditions under which the CPC made these strides, the proletariat was much smaller than the peasantry. In a typical ML analysis, the peasantry have a petty bourgeois character, or at least adopt one once liberated from landlordism. This was one of the major contributions of Mao's CPC to ML theory, as even though the Russian Empire had a similar dynamic, it was not as extreme as China's. In the Russian Empire there had been kulakizatiom to bring more petty bourgeois character to the peasantry and undermine the landlords and the proletariat was larger. China's peasantry were often basically serfs.

This is my way of saying that basically every country has enough proletarians (we can quibble about how prole they are) compared to past successful revolutions. What we run up against most often is a deeply propagandized population that has some kind of dependency on financialization and imperialism, where they receive an "artificial" experience of their class, one heightened. Not quite a labor aristocracy, but one that fails to develop even vulgar class consciousness because nothing happens to them that can break through the propaganda. The coworkers that think unions are for lazy people and just accept being fired as a fact of life, as they are sure they will be employed again very soon, their industry being "in demand", propped up by imperialist technological advantage or some insurance grift. The PMC technocrat that, at least for now, believes they can help solve climate change for a decent wage if they just make good enough slide decks (while their paycheck actually comes from capitalist lobbyists). The retail worker that knows conditions are bad but just puts up with it because they are young and believe the line that it's a practice job and they'll naturally get paid enough and work in better conditions as they get older. It's a house of cards that I believe will crumble when imperialism becomes less effective and the expectations of these workers get a reality check. This is what I would usually call proletarianizatiom of the imperial core, it's making proles prevented from developing class consciousness by confidence in future rewards become instead more directly aware of the bum deal, of seeing their exploitation.

The real challenge is how we will contend against modern fashy reactions to what will probably be seriously incompetent first stabs at real mass left organizing.

Anyways sorry for the really long response. I hope it is relevant and makes sense.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Ok. If you think revolution is impossible, no one's coming to force you off the armchair.

[–] SovietBeerTruckOperator@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, this armchair is pretty comfy

[–] jack@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Firstnamebunchofnumbers@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 5 days ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Chinese state was a shambles back then and the skies weren't full of murder drones. Mao would be the first person to tell you not to run the same plays he ran in the modern US.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, you don't see PSL members waging guerrilla warfare in the countryside, so yeah.

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well that's kind of where the next 990,000 people came from. But maybe I was responding to a non-sequitur and it went over my head.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The 990,000 come from doing the organizing work of a communist party when institutions are dramatically failing the people and they are looking for political leadership.

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago

Yes. While they were engaging in a guerilla war in the countryside.

[–] Terrarium@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

Just gotta invent the Molotov EMP

[–] JDPONDON@hexbear.net 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

do you know the reasoning behind PSL not publicly sharing numbers? from my understanding most of your members are required to be open about being communists, PSL cant be trying to hide the number from the state right???

[–] jack@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No need to show our hand to the state, I suppose. Provides no advantage to do so - our numbers should speak for themselves in our organizing.

[–] JDPONDON@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

i dont understand this, if most members have to be public about their membership how would the feds not have at least a rough idea of how many are in the party? this is ignoring the extremely high probability of assests they've manged to slip inside the PSL who have enough access to inner party knowledge to aquire an even more accurate estimation (not trying to say PSL is co-opted by the feds btw, but i assume they've probably had got one decently highly ranked asset in each notable org in the US).

[–] jack@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

if most members have to be public about their membership

I don't quite agree with that description. Membership can be secret for any number of reasons, and even non-secret members aren't required to blast it publicly all the time.

[–] JDPONDON@hexbear.net 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

maybe i misunderstood about public membership, i was using "have" to very loosely as in you are encouraged to do it if you dont think you will be under threat from local fascist elements. this is a vaguely remembered thing so maybe i am misremembering or something like that. regardless, see my most recent edit, unless this is like top secret information i find it hard to believe the feds dont have a decent estimate on membership.

as a side note, does PSL have an internal online forum like the DSA? asking cause i saw someone bring that up in that slop thread about r/dsa and it made me curious, seems like a relatively decent idea to exchange ideas between distant branches to me

edit: reread my first comment not even sure why i said "required"

[–] jack@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

i find it hard to believe the feds dont have a decent estimate on membership.

Yeah, in sure they do. But we don't have to make it easy for them.

as a side note, does PSL have an internal online forum like the DSA?

No. That sounds like a mess.

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 8 points 5 days ago

The DSA and being a mess, name a more iconic duo.

[–] JDPONDON@hexbear.net 1 points 5 days ago

Yeah, in sure they do. But we don't have to make it easy for them.

why? unless psl is somehow hiding some crazy numbers (especially in the military) and are preparing to try stoke the flames during the next period of large civil unrest in the next few years i dont really understand the advantage of feds knowing "somewhere between 5 and 6 thousand members" and psl putting out online that they have 5k plus members.

No. That sounds like a mess.

how so? it's a forum with inherently limited membership and tied to your real identity, moderation burden should be pretty light and provides a unified platform for discussing local tactics and discussing ideas before the party line is decided upon.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Libs and leftists

"Leftists - help us!"

"Oh, now you want our help."

"Please help us!"

"Let's start with an easy question. Are you willing give up brunch?"

"No."

"You know what? Let's cut to the chase. Are you willing to do anything at all that's radical? Anything at all..."

"No."

"Are you actually asking us to do all the hard work?"

"You need to help us!"

"Oh, it's need now - huh. Without radical action - the US is doomed."

"This was not a productive conversation. Now look what you did. You forced us to be enthusiastic about democratic party lurching to the right to get GOP voters. But it'll work this time. It will.

"Best of luck with that. But maybe it's not a good plan? But you forgot something important. Some GOP voters said that about you. That their anger at you made them vote for Trump."

"Well, fuck you flag burners who hate America anyway."

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We're a nation of crabs in a potato sack

Mmm potato crab please-wake-up

[–] roux@hexbear.net 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm literally never gonna find an actual job, am I? Every day I get buried further down the reserve army of labor.

[–] Cool_Name@lemm.ee 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean? These people who have been wasting their lives idly maintaining crucial government systems will now finally be spurred into action in the private sector! They'll be better for it and we'll be better for it. Most of them will probably become entrepreneurs that will collectively create hundreds of thousands of high quality jobs! Then you'll get a job for sure! A great job! As long as we remove all workplace protections, safety regulations, collective bargaining, wokeness, and keep the minimum wage at the same level as 2009, then businesses will finally have the freedom to give you the great pay and working conditions that they actually have been yearning to give employees this whole time! You just have to believe in the market. Have faith!

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago
[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

We regret to inform you layoff-stare

[–] Hohsia@hexbear.net 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

mr drumpf forgot about the law smuglord

Seriously, does the ACLU ever accomplish anything other than strongly written letters?

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Seriously, does the ACLU ever accomplish anything other than strongly written letters?

I dunno. Help Nazis to get out of legal trouble maybe?

[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they were the ones who got the Nazis their rally permit in Charlottesville

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

The ACLU is so unhinged and disconnected from reality when it comes to the First Amendment. They are like they are fundie zealots following what they see a Commandment from God. They aren't forced to defend Nazis. Nothing is stopping Nazis from getting legal help from somebody else.