this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
199 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19916 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The rich are trying to achieve world domination before we collectively strip them of their excess wealth to fix wealth inequality and dethrone them.

I wish i were kidding...

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Be the change you want to see in the world

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, we get it. Courts are issuing orders. Trump is ignoring them.

Now tell me what they're planning on doing about it or shut the fuck up. And if the answer is "Nothing", then you've effectively reduced our entire justice system to nothing more than an advisory panel for the President that can be ignored like any other crony when he doesn't like their suggestion.

We need an answer to this staredown. One of these judges needs to hold Trump in contempt of court and literally order his arrest. Let the case go up to the Supreme Court and let's see if they actually are willing to all but cede their own power to Trump by saying he can ignore court rulings with impunity. And if not, let them say how they plan on forcing Trump to abide by their rulings, and if so how. Let's see if authorities are going to back up the Supreme Court, or if they're going to back up Trump and essentially hand the entire country over to him by saying they're refusing to enforce Supreme Court decisions.

And it's not like it would take long either. Issue an order for his arrest for contempt of court today, and it'll be in front of the Supreme Court by lunch. And they wouldn't be able to table it for years either; they'd have no other choice but to weigh in one way or the other. Like that day. They'd have to. Every day they'd waffle on it would be a day that they'd be telling the country that the Supreme Court has no real power.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 36 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Finally the media will actually say it. I've been trying to point this out for a week but no one has been talking about it. Ignoring lawful court orders, laws passed by congress, and the constitution. This is not a drill, please think about what it will take to reverse this and what you personally can contribute to this struggle. The consequences will be dire for everyone if this is not stopped.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I believe you, but it’s too late. We elected a mad man -twice, and have never once followed through with any sorta legal action, punishment, or repercussions for his sly/illegal behavior. What can we do now except hope to vote against his party/interest in 2 years and continue to write letters to congressmen (who don’t read them).

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 hours ago

It's never too late.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

There are plenty of political actions one can take beyond voting and there is absolutely not time to wait 2 years to address these things. Protest, join orgs fighting this, call your representatives, do anything you can think of.

It's never too late. Remember, whatever democratic protections we have today were fought and clawed from the rulers of the past by people like us. Worst case scenario we have a repeat of that situation but they never win in the long run. The human spirit and desire for freedom can never be permanently defeated.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Unionize. Unionize while you still can

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 hours ago

Good point I should have mentioned that one.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 39 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

As no surprise to anyone, he has no respect for the law.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago

Well, we’ve already been told that you can’t prosecute a sitting president, and you can’t really hold them responsible for “Official Acts”, so there’s really no reason for Trump to take direction from the courts seriously.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Well, except those laws that give him what he wants - like the stacked Supreme Court saying virtually anything he does in office automatically comes with blanket immunity from prosecution.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The trouble is that what trump is doing is similar to what other current dictatorship countries did when transitioning from a democracy to a dictatorship.

When you throw a million different conflicting stories at the general public such as one day banning all foreign investment, and the other day expropriating domestic companies, people start to get overwhelmed with information overloaded.

Next thing you know in 6 months to a year the government you knew no longer exists and all your rights where stripped.

[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago

Yup a Nixon move and he’ll be buddy busy with Patel trying to go after political rivals and whistle blowers. Democracy lasted 249 years