243
submitted 8 months ago by shish_mish@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 181 points 8 months ago

If you dont 100% agree with every action of Israel's government, then you're their enemy.

It's a common thing with far right religious extremists.

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 51 points 8 months ago

far right religious extremists.

Fascists.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

I've never met a far right religious extremist that wasn't a fascist...

But there are some non religious fascists.

It's a square/rectangle thing.

[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 months ago

For sure. Just making sure that word gets thrown into the mix for accuracy.

[-] Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

They're practically synonyms.

[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 24 points 8 months ago

And it’s because you’re an antisemite.

[-] frshmt@lemmy.zip 38 points 8 months ago

We’re all antisemite on this blessed day

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 12 points 8 months ago

Maybe the real treasure was the antisemite we met along the way

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago
[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[-] huquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I am all antisemite on this blessed day!

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The instant someone makes that accusation, I disengage. I’ve learned the hard way.

People think that calling someone antisemitic (or anti-Muslim) is a great debate tactic if you’re trying to put your opponent on the defensive and derail the conversation. There’s a major difference between criticizing a government/organization and general bigotry, and they know that perfectly well, but people who want an easy, emotional argument don’t care. They’re not interested in details.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 8 months ago

With the US at Israels back, lets not pretend the UN wasn't always optional for them anyway.

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 18 points 8 months ago

I would love to see the US abandon Israel and let them pay for their own military/genocidal operations, but I know that's unpossible in the current political climate.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

It’s only impossible if you stay silent. Call your congress people. Tell them how you feel about it. Make a case for pushing peace and not giving militar aid.

(Imo all aid should be in the form of supporting peace talks or protecting civilians, but I don’t know what the second part would look like.)

[-] Unaware7013@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago

I have reached out to my congresscritters, but I'm in a gerrymandered area and mainly have trump nuts gargling toadies that would rather let the country burn than dare let people they don't agree with have a voice.

That's why I say it's unpossible, because I don't have the dosh to influence the idiots into not being war mongering fucksticks that actually care about anyone brown or without money.

That's not to say I'm not still trying, I just can see I'm pissing into the wind.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If it's somehow any consolation, I'm in a place where it's the opposite and I could vote for anything and the democrats would win regardless, and whenever I try to push my representatives on issues that don't align with where the party already is, I get what is essentially an automated response.

How funny, after writing the above I searched my reps name in my inbox to go through some past ones, and the last one where I wasn't just urging them to follow through on trump was the Israel Palestine conflict centered around Sheikh Jarrah in 2021. I asked him to make it matter in the next budget. All I got was a semi pre-written response where my senator said he supported asking for a ceasefire. Maybe I'm the moron for asking my senator to stand up and ask the rest of congress to give Israel less money instead of just asking for them to stop shooting. Everyone's asking them to stop shooting, not everyone has real power to change the conditions that allows the shootings, I thought that was the point of appealing to the government.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago

Israel is the US' key military foothold in the region, that's the deal and that's going to prevent anything more than a light rebuke.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

you might be right, but the reality is yanking US support is an existential crisis for Israel.

we have more leverage in that game.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

There are small town mayors with more power than the entire UN. The whole thing is optional.

[-] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

Fucking children with nuclear briefcases, terrifying. Guterres's speech was very, very balanced.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 9 points 8 months ago

From 2019:

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has banned two Democratic U.S. congresswomen from visiting the country and the Palestinian territories this weekend, according to a government official.

The two representatives have been vocal critics of the Israeli government and Trump's unwavering support of Netanyahu. They also voted against a nonbinding resolution condemning a Palestinian-led movement calling for boycotts, divestment and sanctions in Israel, which they have repeatedly defended.

Anyone see a pattern here?

Full story

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
243 points (97.6% liked)

News

21742 readers
3499 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS