this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
245 points (98.8% liked)

News

25503 readers
3851 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 46 points 1 day ago

I cancelled back when Bezos pulled the Harris endorsement and have yet to look back.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Capitalism always ruins everything in the end

[–] credo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was supposed to be its own way to make money, as a counterpoint to other interests by selling juicy information. It breaks when its captured to further those interests’ agendas instead.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really. The wealthy classes had no issue making money under mercantilism. The issue was, no matter how much money they made. They were denied a level of power and control gate kept by monarchs. Economic liberalism did away with the divine right of kings and rule by bloodlines. Replacing it with something ultimately, arguably worse.

As inbred and shitty as most monarchies were. Oftentimes they at least attempted to be educated and trained to be decent rulers despite generally failing. All capitalism ultimately did was simply redefine who gets to be a monarch. And do away with any pretense of being trained or educated to be a decent ruler. Now we simply promote the least qualified most mentally ill and unscrupulous people possible.

In fact the average person stands to make a far more money under any system that doesn't tolerate monarchs, oligarchs, or vanguards. As opposed to capitalism for Marxist leninism which does.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Economic liberalism did away with the divine right of kings and rule by bloodlines. Replacing it with something ultimately, arguably worse.

Come on, man! The serfs/peasants/slaves had it way worse than anyone living under "economic liberalism". There is no comparison! Not even close.

I will agree that zero tolerance policies oligarchs (all well as senior associates, propagandists and enablers) does benefit everyone.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Comparing them out of context to us has no value. The average serf today works more for comparatively less than those that lived under many monarchs. Do you think the average serf back then worked 40 hour weeks. 40+ weeks a year? This isn't a defense of monarchies however. Just a condemnation of capitalism.

The increase in standard of living comes from industrialization and automation. Not capitalism. Because for all the atrocities and faults of ideologies like Leninism. They achieved similar increases in standard of living. Which again, is not a defense or praise of Leninism. Just pointing out that capitalism is equally contemptible at least.

Show me a system that doesn't allow for oligarchs or vanguard, and we'll talk.

[–] CheeryLBottom@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Thanks for the reminder to cancel my subscription. It's done

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

We used to have laws against this sort of thing...

The primary goal of the law was to "let anyone enter any communications business – to let any communications business compete in any market against any other."[2] Thus, the statute is often described as an attempt to deregulate the American broadcasting and telecommunications markets due to technological convergence.[3] The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has been praised for incentivizing the expansion of networks and the offering of new services across the United States.[4] At the same time, it is often criticized for enabling market concentration in the media and telecommunications industries.[5][6]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996

But then modern neoliberalism showed up and put an end to that....

Like, are you mad Sinclair Broadcasting bought up local TV stations and force them to read identical scripts?

They couldn't have done that until 1996, and there was a reason those regulations existed prior.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Honestly you should never trust a billionaire to tell the truth tbh

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think they have really been independent for a while now. At least since he bought them.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago

They were once independent of the President. That's not really allowed anymore.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm conflicted. I feel like I should stop stealing their content, but isn't that what they want?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The problem is that the Washington Post is pocket change for Bezos. To hurt him, you need to move off AWS and stop buying from Amazon

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are other ways to hurt him.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Let's-a-go!

[–] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I’m paraphrasing here: About 200K people canceled their WaPo subs after they failed to endorse. Bezos made $400M in the stock surge that happened after Agent Orange was elected.

So he made about $2K for every cancellation.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

What definition of "independent press" are they using here? Bozo bought it over ten years ago.