this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
92 points (94.2% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2416 readers
753 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In suggesting that Democrats were wrong about trans athletes and cozying up to MAGA favorites, Newsom's presidential ambitions are more craven than ever.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pundits, analysts, and some Democrat politicians have recently begun suggesting that Harris lost due to the party leaning too far left, as evidenced by the support of trans rights.

Blaming an empty gesture of goodwill toward vulnerable people for the party’s failure is an interesting form of introspection.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

They did the same after Hillary. Dumbfucks.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"I am currently going through a transitional phase. Please bare with me and witness me" thanks Gavin, go fuck yourself and next time be transparent with your mental shortcomings. It's a slippery slope, gav, next comes the sexual assault and pedophilia

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

next comes the sexual assault and pedophilia

It was my understanding that these preceded the transition to right wing ideology.

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Now that fucking around is happening that means it will soon be time to find out (that he is unpopular)

Liberals

Will

Not

Save

You

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

If Dems rally behind him, then they really didn't learn a damn thing.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I have no real desire to listen to a full episode of Gavin Newsom and Charlie Kirk, but am curious to what topics they did disagree on.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The more "we're here for the power" and self-aware kind of far-right people use the term "libcuck" (and also "leftcuck") in relation of defanging their opposition by making them take the moral high ground (their proudest achievement is that many people consider Kiwifarms a "necessary evil" because they sometimes go after animal abusers (it's all virtue signaling though), while they don't hold this same standard to antifa or leftist callouts), making them "cancel" each other, and getting them to move to the right on certain topics.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They don't call him slick for nothin.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

0% surprised

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh NO there's about to be a Pedophilia Accusation against him isn't there? Republicans LOVE Pedophiles!

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Note that with Muskrat in power, they can just manufacture proofs on Xitter, and just "anonymize" the nonexistent victim.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

He knows the old game is over. Barron and Jnr have no support, and the Oligarchs need a figurehead to take the heat, so why not Gavin?