this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
1286 points (99.4% liked)

World News

44040 readers
3610 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Finland has declined a U.S. request to export eggs amid a severe American shortage caused by bird flu.

The Finnish Poultry Association cited the lack of prior trade agreements and complex regulatory hurdles. Even if exports were possible, Finland’s limited egg production would not significantly impact the U.S. crisis.

Other European nations, including Sweden and Denmark, also face difficulties meeting U.S. demand, while Europe grapples with its own egg shortages.

The U.S. has turned to countries like Turkey and the Netherlands for supplies as bird flu remains a global issue.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Every country should refuse to send eggs to the US.

The only way I would consider it would be if there was a US wide broadcast where the world leader that gives them some has a low-level staffer ask JD Vance if he is going to “say thank you even once”. Trump needs to then tell JD that he has to say thank you because “we don’t have the cards. With them, we start to have cards”.

If they won’t say that on television, put export tariffs on eggs to the US at 500%.

It has to be 500% because 3 times the current price of eggs in Canada is about what they are selling for in the US already.

[–] Dropper_Post@lemm.ee 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

WW3 will be caused by shortage of eggs in US and they will invade every country and will take all eggs and hens. Mark my words

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

This reminds of the 90s TV Show Dinosaurs (still an all-time classic) where they had a two parter about war... and what was the cause of the war? Nuts! Literally. War over nuts and their increasing prices and blaming other people for it. So war it is

One of the funniest anti war episodes of all time.

[–] global__warning@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 15 hours ago

i am fully in support of them not selling us eggs.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 36 points 20 hours ago
[–] Alloi@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

wonder if rapey mc rapist and techno nazi along with their gaggle of dip shit losers invested in poultry and eggs before this.

i mean its not uncommon for rich assholes and their corporate entities to heavily invest in things they know are about skyrocket in price or short smaller out circle businesses they know wont make it if the market craches, especially if they get to control the "soft landing"

even during a recession its possible to make a pyramid sized pile of cash if you bet on the right failure, even more so if you can fix the bet in the first place by forcing its price down.

they literally made a whole movie about this about the 2008 financial crisis.

you may not see it on paper right now, but that doesnt mean corpos arent sifting cash into secret accounts, either directly or on their behalf.

[–] rockettaco37@lemmy.world 154 points 1 day ago (11 children)

This is what happens when you burn all your bridges. I'm American myself and to be brutally honest, I hope most of the free world will continue to refuse requests to export to us.

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 34 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

The US is no longer a member of the 'free world'. Traveling to US now is just as dangerous as travelling to China.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago

At least in China the likelihood of you getting gunned down by either police or some drunkard is significantly lower than US. As for other problem like scam or pickpocket or government overreach for some opinion, you won't ever need to worry if you follow some common sense and common travelling tips. Authoritarian government like CCP treat traveller better than local.

[–] Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Now I might be naive or plain wrong, but I tell you completely honestly, that I would always have been more concerned for my safety travelling to the US than China.

Naturally, one would steer away from discussing politics or behaving in 'concerning' ways in China - for example filming government buildings.

But, I have never felt I'd be in any danger doing average tourist stuff in China. I've been there twice, to more rural parts as it happens, and felt safe: People friendly, no edge.

US on the other hand... I admit I've barely visited to transfer flights, but the idea of being let loose in the US is considerably more challenging for me. Knowing that everyone is potentially armed, that trigger happy police are everywhere, there are high racial tensions, drugged up homeless etc.

This was truly my impression even before Trump was ever a household name.

Is it surprising to Americans that a Brit would genuinely feel that way around about the two countries? I don't know. It doesn't seem controversial to me, but then I read Americans talking about China as though it's some scary place for them.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago (10 children)

yeah, it sucks, I wish we had this cheap protein, but, like... americans need to suffer. they need to suffer, and they need to know it's their leader's fault.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They need to know it's their fault. They elected him, either through action or inaction.

Then they need to do some introspection to figure out what the fuck is wrong with them.

But they won't because America doesn't do that. 9/11, for example, had nothing to do with anything America had done.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

what happened on the ninth of november?

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The suffering is almost a guarantee, but I'm not holding my breath on anyone that doesn't already do so holding Trump accountable for shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure. But the American empire will not just slowly die. As their people lose their "toys" that distract them they will need someone to blame it on that isn't the US government.

This will at some point be other western nations along with their current scapegoat of immigrants and Palestine supporters. The American empire will use its military power long before it just lets it's empire die. Its playing cards to see which nations it can blame first and which western allies will decide to align with them rather than face their military.

I agree with all the anti American boycotts. I do. But I don't think people realize exactly where that is heading on a world stage.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I suspect more people than you think realise this is a potential outcome.

Assuming it boils over before there is another election (also assuming that's a thing that happens), military action is 100% a playable card.

It's a toddler with a nuclear tantrum button.

It's honestly not that much different in type then most nuclear powered nations.

The difference is "absolute last resort, and only maybe then" vs "they won't let me annex Greenland and are being mean to me"

Hyperbolic ofc, but illustrative.

What are the reasonable good alternatives though?

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Maybe, I'm mostly just worried that the western world is fueling nationalism with these tariff wars. The "good alternative" is understanding that the tariff's are not a war between nations but a war on the working class. These tariff's are paid by the working class. The good alternative is understanding that the working class of each of these countries SHOULD be fighting against the ruling classes of each nation. The ruling classes between nations being in "conflict" is a charade. No one in the ruling class cares of the consequences but only sees them as an opportunity to fuel nationalism and reactionary sentiment.

So, while I will agree with anti America and anti imperialism. I just think that the "buy European" or "by Canadian" are missing the forest for the trees. The ruling class of Canada or Europe are not fighting a war against America. They are worsening the material conditions of their working class (in response to the Americans doing so) in order to maintain the profits of the ruling class of their nations.

It is absolutely ignorant to think that Canada or Europe or any other capitalist nation is fighting for the interest of their working class. They are fighting for the interest of their ruling class and will use nationalism to justify the worsening conditions we all face.

TLDR: This is not a war between nations but a war between class. (I know Marxist cliche but read it if you want more than that.)

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 3 points 3 hours ago

In Canada, a somewhat Trump inspired populist right leaning party had 100% of winning the next election.prediction markets had it at 93%.

since the beginning of Trumps tarring stacks, the center left party had surged in popularity to a degree not even thought possible. If the election was today, they would win.

Trump is giving people somebody to rally against. And the “us” vs “them” is the the world vs the US.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

A worldwide revolution in which everyone unites against the "ruling class" isn't a viable alternative in and of itself, that's like saying "world peace".

An example of an alternative would be something which could fill in the blank in this sentence and make sense.

"Don't boycott products/companies, that isn't how you achieve your goal, what you should be doing is "

This is not a war between nations but a war between class

The issue i have with this isn't that it's a marxist cliche (i'll take your word on that, I've no idea) it's that it presents a false dichotomy in which a class war and a national war can't both be occurring at the same time.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

trump is going to tariff finland now because "wahh"

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

This mental image popped into my head, after reading your comment. Now you get to enjoy it too, wAaHhh!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

Has anyone offered to sell us eggs at exorbitant prices? Cuz that would be funny as hell.

[–] Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee 16 points 10 hours ago

Come on now, that's not how you spell eggsorbitant

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

At $500 an egg, I'm willing to take a return transatlantic flight.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 324 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Nobody should send us eggs. Nobody should give us anything, given the government we have now

Orangeboi wants transactional, so give him transactional. Hold the US state department over the barrel as long as you can. Hold our feet to the fire. Make the negotiations as torturous and hostile as possible. Squeeze us until you see blood. Get absolutely everything you can out of any “deal” you make with us - it’s the “art of the deal”, after all.

There are huge swaths of Americans and political leadership that now really need to find out, because they’ve been fucking around and ruining things for far too long.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The US is going to be begging for more than just eggs in a few months. California is one of their biggest agricultural states and they have no water; Trump had them empty their reservoirs in an idiotic attempt to fight the wildfires earlier this year. Plus, the whole country is dependent on Canadian potash to fertilize their crops.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 3 points 15 hours ago

Is there anybody who's done the analysis on his bad it will be? California's online tracker shows right now that nearly every major reservoir in the state is above the historical average level for March 15th. The system as a whole is at over 78% of capacity. The news stories that I found put the releases at of 2.2 billion gallons, which is not much. (The lake near me contains about 133 billion gallons.) They were from Lake Kaweah and Lake Success, both reservoirs which primarily serve flood-control functions.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago

Dumping all that water from the reservoirs did nothing but sabotaging California's ability to make it through the dry season. Not a drop of it went to fire-fighting. Trump is a wrecker and a liar.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DeadNinja@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago

Did you say thanks ? No? Go lay your own...

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 150 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Okay, but you have to become the 20th province of Finland."

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I accept Finland's terms. Now that I'm a Finnish citizen, I would like to move to the country proper.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

now you can go to the doctor without losing your home!

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 61 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How about we introduce export tariffs on eggs instead.

[–] 1984 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Seems strange to give eggs to a country who talks of just taking over countries left and right.

Maybe rotten eggs would be more suitable.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 97 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm sure the Finns aren't exactly keen to take a price hike on eggs to meet a hostile country's needs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Egg prices aren’t high solely because of bird flu. They’re high because of regional monopolies and a price fixing cartel. The largest egg producers are seeing record profits.

I hope it’s clear that I’m not saying bird flu doesn’t exist or affect prices. I’m not much of a conspiracy theorist. But if I had to guess, I’d say it’s 10% bird flu and 90% companies raising prices in unison because they can blame bird flu. If it were just bird flu, the companies would be losing money.

NB: it feels very weird to call them “egg producers” because hens are the actual egg producers. Egg distributors, maybe? In any case, the distributors are doing fine and their only competition in most regions are small, organic farms whose eggs were already $7 a dozen. It’s just the low end of the market that’s gone crazy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Every country should avoid doing business with Trump’s regime because he will screw you over either way.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 day ago (6 children)

If only there were regulations that kept these diseases at bay. Certainly our corporate farms will always spend the money and effort to prevent things themselves though.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›