this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
246 points (98.4% liked)

Gaming

19998 readers
141 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yurt_Owl@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

surprised how successful this was since it barely got a mention all the time it was in early access so thought it would have a relatively mild release but no the g*mers heard bear sex and everyone flooded in to buy it.

[–] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the g*mers heard bear sex and everyone flooded in to buy it.

side-eye-1 side-eye-2

I think it's more so that "bear sex" was just joke-worthy enough that people talked about the game that otherwise wouldn't talk about it and news of the game spread beyond its usual corners of the internet. So more people heard of the game and I guess the openness that "bear sex" entails is pretty appealing for a CRPG.

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could it be that the hard core Baldur's Gate fans are OG/serious Gamers and have learned to not pre-order? BG 1 & 2 were released way before gaming was mainstream. Most of the casual gamers probably only care about BG3 due to hype from other gamers who would also be "Never Pre-order" folk.

[–] Yurt_Owl@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

Its more that no one wanted to burn themselves out on early access before the real thing came out but actually it was the bear sex

[–] Ghost33313@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

My wife found out BG was out. Saw it was a full release price and was kind of like, "meh I can wait". I joked about everyone playing just wanted to edit their character's genitals and she immediately put it on top of her Wishlist.

[–] TXinTXe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

2.5 million copies sold in EA, but barely got a mention? ok...

[–] Shalaska@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good to hear. I always new the lie the AAA publishers push that no one wants single player rpgs anymore, but numbers like this prove it out. No AAA we aren’t skipping your games because we don’t want the stories m, we are just tired of spending $70 only to discover it is full of micro transactions, always online issues, and all the other AAA predatory tactics!

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

AND, didn't actually wrapping up the story, for sequel sake.

BG3 is so huge even if it's only the beginning arc(Larian tends to taper off at the end, lol), I had to "replay" some decision making and see how outcome and the exp net gain and to decide how I proceed.(yep I save scum, don't hate me I have limited time and want to explore content and choices to my desire outcome. Then my other play through I can be more free form, and I bet there are something I haven't seen yet from this good guy talk things out approach.)

[–] Bimbus@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well deserved. Im in Act 3 and the game is phenomenal.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How?? My friend and I have logged 15 hours and...we haven't even reached a city yet

[–] Bimbus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I took off Thursday - Friday to play and that's all I've done all weekend. Back at work now. :(

[–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Same must not be sleeping a lot

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Poor fella has a mind flayer brain parasite egging him on at all times.

[–] Lethtor@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wait, acts? Are there literally like title screens like "Act 2 - The bad thing happens" or do you just call it act three in a storytelling structure kind of thing? Because I played like 15 hours this weekend and only barely made it to the underdark for the first time (no idea how far into the game that is). Howlongtobeat said the main story takes like 24 hours so I figured I'm a good way through the game already.

Can't wait to get back to it

[–] Hanabie@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Underdark is still Act 1. You're on your way to the Act ending, but not quite there.

[–] Bimbus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's probably an estimate for Early Access. There's so much more to the game. You're just scratching the surface of the game :p

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The no lifer, are you not married or have kids to tend to?

But I am glad that you literally can save anywhere(except cutscenes) and continue.

[–] Lethtor@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I literally had the entire Sunday off to play with nothing (urgent) to do. Don't get many days like that though. Literally played for 13 hours yesterday

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Oh dang... I was just going to pirate it in like eight years. It's online? I have to play it now? I have to buy it??

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly mate? Buy it. This isn't a AAA game; this is a AA game made completely independently, without microtransactions or lootboxes or any of the many bullshit practices of modern gaming. The studio deserves your support.

It does have a multiplayer component, but it's co-op. The game can be played in its entirety either way, and indeed, the single player experience is fantastic. So's the multiplayer experience. The former is similar to Dragon Age Origins, and the latter is literally Dungeons and Dragons. Both are fantastic, and both are worth playing.

Don't skip it. This is a deeply special game, and if you're sick of the AAA bullshit, a great way to show the greater industry is by supporting it. Vote with your wallet.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't have the gross monetization games are trending to, but it's most definitely a AAA game.

You can't match the scope and production quality at a AA budget.

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FWIW, AAA is not typically defined by budget, but instead by the presence of a publisher and methods of release. If you go by standard definitions, as a completely independent developer who crowdfunded the game at the start, Larian's actually indie.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is no consistent definition for AA or AAA. It's just an implied level of production value. This game's got the equivalent modern day production value of a AAA game from 15 years ago, but the production value of AAA games like Call of Duty and Red Dead Redemption these days has soared to levels unattainable to most.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only shot for shot.

Those studios with those budgets couldn't do meaningfully better with hundreds of hours of scenes to shoot.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure you could. The Witcher 3 has better production value by a meaningful amount with tons of scenes to shoot and permutations of those scenes. People said you couldn't meaningfully do better than the likes of the Kickstarter CRPGs ten years ago because of how much work would go into voice acting and animating all of those scenes, but BG3 is the better production value version of that.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Frankly I think that's laughable. The Witcher 3 is fine production quality wise, but it's not even sort of competitive with BG3. The main quest line vs BG3 side quests, maybe, but there's a huge step down to the animation quality of anything else.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm still working my way through BG2, but even watching main story quests in BG3 in the footage that's coming out around launch, the thought frequently enters my mind that the Witcher 3 looks better, like it got better touch-ups beyond what the engine automates for them.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

A lot of the storytelling is through 2D scenes giving the illusion of being animated by moving pieces around (which does the job perfectly fine), and a lot of the side quest stuff is just plopping one character without any impressive animation in one spot just dropped in the world.

In BG3, there are a bunch of minor side quests where there are several characters interacting with each other in the 3D world, and your decision making branches branch harder. Just the sheer number of otherwise "minor" interactions with fully animated, voiced, and narrated actions is crazy.

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Cough fitgirls got it cough

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Oh dang this is my first post on lemmy. Uh.... hey soviet-bashful

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

There’s a multiplayer component like in Larian’s previous Divintiy: Original Sin games where your friends can join your party, but otherwise you can play it pretty much single-player.

Fwiw, I apparently paid for it like 3 years ago when it was in Early Access on Steam and forgot about it until I went to try and buy it again recently, but it’s absolutely worth the $60 if you wanna play it now bs later.