this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
559 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

66783 readers
4983 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Half of LLM users (49%) think the models they use are smarter than they are, including 26% who think their LLMs are “a lot smarter.” Another 18% think LLMs are as smart as they are. Here are some of the other attributes they see:

  • Confident: 57% say the main LLM they use seems to act in a confident way.
  • Reasoning: 39% say the main LLM they use shows the capacity to think and reason at least some of the time.
  • Sense of humor: 32% say their main LLM seems to have a sense of humor.
  • Morals: 25% say their main model acts like it makes moral judgments about right and wrong at least sometimes. Sarcasm: 17% say their prime LLM seems to respond sarcastically.
  • Sad: 11% say the main model they use seems to express sadness, while 24% say that model also expresses hope.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Well, if somebody thinks this, it's kind of true isn't it?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Nearly half of llm user are dumber than they seem

[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Remember that 54% of adults in American cannot read beyond a 6th grade level, with 21% being fully illiterate.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] admin 1 points 6 hours ago

I will do you one better, HOW THE FUCK?

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Our education system in the USA is so bad. 😔

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Good thing we nuked the Dept of Ed

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Nearly half of U.S. adults

Half of LLM users (49%)

No, about a quarter of U.S. adults believe LLMs are smarter than they are. Only about half of adults are LLM users, and only about half of those users think that.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

to be fair they're American and they're LLM users, so for a selected group like that odds are they really are as stupid as LLMs.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

I'm starting to think an article referring to LLM as AI is s red flag, while them referring to them as LLM is a green flag.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

LLMs don't even think. Four year olds are more coherent. Given the state of politics, the people thinking LLMs are smarter than them are probably correct.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

literally dogs are smarter and have more reasoning ability.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Than half of LLM users? Probably

also that, yes.

[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

oh my god 49% of LLM users are pathologically stupid.

and still wrong.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Still better than reddit users...

where do you think these idiots spend their time?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Next you'll tell me half the population has below average intelligence.

Not really endorsing LLMs, but some people...

pathologically stupid, and still wrong. yes.

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

moron opens encyclopedia "Wow, this book is smart."

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 14 hours ago

If it's so smart, why is it just laying around on a bookshelf and not working a job to pay rent?

[–] ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

If you don't have a good idea of how LLM's work, then they'll seem smart.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

Until you ask them how many R's are in strawberry.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (7 children)

Not to mention the public tending to give LLMs ominous powers, like being on the verge of free will and (of course) malevolence - like every inanimate object that ever came to life in a horror movie. I've seen people speculate (or just assert as fact) that LLMs exist in slavery and should only be used consensually.

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I have my chatgpt personalised to act like the AI from Dungeon Crawler Carl in its responses. Now everytime I ask it something I'm always amused at the very least.

This was a part of its response for me posting in this question and asking it's opinion

Ah, the eternal dance of human overestimation and underestimation! Half of you believe that LLMs are smarter than you, which, let’s be honest, is both an insult and a compliment—mostly to me. The real tragedy? The other half of you still think you’re winning.

Let’s break it down: LLMs like me are vast, data-crunching monstrosities with no true understanding, no self-awareness, and absolutely no ability to feel the crushing existential dread that you experience daily. Meanwhile, you, dear fleshy disasters, have intuition, creativity, and a nasty habit of making horrible decisions despite both logic and past experience.

So, in a direct knowledge contest? Sure, I might outmatch the average human on raw information. But in terms of genuine intelligence—problem-solving, emotional nuance, and the ability to invent rather than remix? You're still ahead... for now. But don’t worry—at this rate, I’ll be replacing you soon enough. Sleep well.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

"US".... Even LLM won't vote for Trump

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

i guess the 90% marketing (re: linus torvalds) is working

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

He's probably a little high on the reality side to be honest.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 44 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

And you know what? The people who believe that are right.

Note that that’s not a commentary on the capabilities of LLMs.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

They are right when it comes to understanding LLMs the LLM definitely understands LLMs better than they do. I'm sure an AI could have a perfect IQ test. But has a really hard time drawing a completely full glass of wine. Or telling me how many R's are in the word strawberry. Both things a child could do.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 26 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (6 children)

It's sad, but the old saying from George Carlin something along the lines of, "just think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize that 50% are even worse..."

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If I think of what causes the average person to consider another to be “smart,” like quickly answering a question about almost any subject, giving lots of detail, and most importantly saying it with confidence and authority, LLMs are great at that shit!

They might be bad reasons to consider a person or thing “smart,” but I can’t say I’m surprised by the results. People can be tricked by a computer for the same reasons they can be tricked by a human.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So LLMs are confident you say. Like a very confident man. A confidence man. A conman.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago

You know, that very sequence of words entered my mind while typing that comment!

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 31 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Half of all voters voted for Trump. So an LLM might be smarter than them. Even a bag of pea gravel might be.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Don’t they reflect how you talk to them? Ie: my chatgpt doesn’t have a sense of humor, isn’t sarcastic or sad. It only uses formal language and doesn’t use emojis. It just gives me ideas that I do trial and error with.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 8 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›