this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1814 points (99.5% liked)

Work Reform

11252 readers
1095 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 49 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Man I was sad as shit when Nina Turner lost. Bernie Sanders backed her up too.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Wow, that just threw me for a loop. I still remember the hits, like "Steamy Windows" or "We Don't Need Another Hero". But then, that was Tina Turner. Not Nina. πŸ˜…

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 293 points 1 day ago (16 children)

I love how one person cites a statistic, and another person just dismisses it as false because of their anecdotal experience.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Sounds like every online platform ever.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is how most people think and see the world, which is why we (the US) are in the boat we're in now. People don't see the big picture if they never have to or aren't taught how to think critically.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 195 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I live in California, so there was a lot of bemoaning the rising minimum wage.

β€œWhy should someone flipping burgers earn as much as I do in a trade field?”

Mate, you should be arguing for increased wages, not trying to keep others down.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

This is the new American way. Zero-sum thinking all the way down. Anyone else's win is our loss. Every situation must have a winner and a loser. Win-win situations are considered immoral for these people. We've moved past rugged individualism to a full-on Hunger Games mindset.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 67 points 1 day ago (17 children)

How is it even legal to have explicitly preferential pay for people not in a union? Is there a limit to that, or can companies just say, "Anyone who joins a union will be paid minimum wage." Ofc with at-will employment they can always just fire you, but like, if you think about it it's pretty fucked up right?

[–] Sheldan@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (5 children)

I don't think it's preferential pay. It's just that they pay more, somebody in the union also can get more money than the union minimum. Somebody not part of the union can get less or more than somebody in the union, just not below the union minimum.

It's not that if they join the union that they get less money. The union + 0.5 just means that they earn better than the minimum and the employer gives them more than the minimum, because people like that.

At least that's how it works where I live and union contracts are common.

Not everyone part of the union has to get exactly the union minimum, it's just that you cannot legally get less. People might not be part of the union but they still fall under the union contract negotiated by the union, because it applies to the entire company.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 17 hours ago

So even then, the union people might be making more than the union minimum, so the non union person might still be making less than an average union person while not getting any union benefits.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

How is it even legal to have explicitly preferential pay for people not in a union?

Other than the minimum wage and protected classes, there's not really any laws around how much employers must pay. They can have two employees, Bob and Tina, and pay Bob half of Tina's salary because they just hate the name "Bob". If Bob doesn't like it he can quit.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

sounds like their pay is based on union rates. that's probably just a company policy for everyone.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (118 children)

What I'm saying is that if they can set "$0.50 above union rates" as the company policy for everyone, they can also set "$5 above union rates" as the company policy for everyone and then cut union rates by $5. It's essentially just bribing people to not join a union or penalizing them if they do. It being company policy for everyone is irrelevant.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 11 points 1 day ago (16 children)

They can't cut union rates.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (117 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago (7 children)

"your statistic is false because I have an anecdote" is literally the entire basis of the conservative understanding of science.

union workers don't make more on average because I earn half a dollar more.

global warming isn't happening because I brought a snowball.

vaccines cause death because my friend walked out of a clinic after a shot and got hit by a self driving tesla.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 147 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Cathy is a dumbass. Don't be like Cathy.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 day ago (7 children)

That’s up there with refusing raises to avoid going up a tax bracket.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί