this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
28 points (73.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

32590 readers
670 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There's actually conjecture in the Nicole community that Nicole might actually be the victim of bullying or some creepy obsession on the part of the perp.

It's not really awesome at all.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There’s a Nicole community now?

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago

yeah !nicole@feddit.org

Only a few posts.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Glent@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Personally, yes.

We're getting married!

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Congratulations, but please don't invite me to the wedding 🙂

[–] Deebster@programming.dev 9 points 11 hours ago

We're all getting invited.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

One of us! One of us!

[–] PaulBunyan@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What does “Nicole-ed” mean? I’m curious if it matches the Nicole I know.

[–] weremacaque@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

She’s everyone’s proud Polish wife from Toronto.

Apparently there’s a vulnerability with sending messages with images in them and “she” might be logging people’s IP addresses through that. I’m under the impression that while the Nicole images are probably all pictures of the same girl, the scammer is not her.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Every one of the posts today that I've received have the url https://lemmy.laitinlok.com/pictrs/image/e1be7d9e-9e3e-4ba9-9c08-1ff084b554e1.png. If everyone has the same links, then logging people's IP would get you the same information as logging IPs from a public post in any popular community. I think that would only make sense if each user was receiving different URLs, for the attacker to log the requested resource and their reference of which user they sent that URL to. I can't confirm this suspicion on my own, but if the URL I posted is the same one you got today, then I doubt there's any attempt to match users to their IP addresses.

[–] Rivalarrival 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The URL you posted is not what I received.

Some sort of deanonymizing and/or tracking is the only thing that makes sense here.

A VPN is called for any time we might receive a Nicole message, or any time we access a previously received message.