this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
953 points (99.3% liked)

politics

22365 readers
3780 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic lawmakers have faced eruptions of anger at town hall meetings across the country this week, as constituents have coupled their fury over President Donald Trump’s actions with deep frustration over what they see as a feckless Democratic response.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It’s remarkable that so many are blaming Democrats for what’s happening, instead of the Republicans doing the things, people who voted for the Republicans doing the things, and non-voters who decided they don’t care about Republicans doing the things.

No wonder your country is fucked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PillBugTheGreat@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Republicans arent showing up to hear the message, so let's shit talk the dems.

You aren't crazy. This shit is fucked up.

Be mad about it. Be frustrated. Figure out what you can do about it in your circle of influence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 227 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Time for the neoliberal world order to end. Want Republicans to actually be scared of Democrats? Fill the party with socialists.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 116 points 1 week ago (11 children)

This is correct. Ultimately, the Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries. Not town halls or performative third party voting, but filling the party up with people who think differently.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries

And that means it's time for everyone to actually give a shit about voting in primary elections instead of just old people who keep choosing the worst candidates.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not just voting, but running for election.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

While I agree, I'm a "child of the internet" so pretty much any opposition research on me would have me murdered by probably everyone.

Maybe I should run. I could unite the left and right in their disgust of me lol

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe the real Modern Warfare was the blackmail material we created on ourselves along the way

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But the corporations that donate to the party don’t want this.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

And as long as privately ran organization owned by those rich people (the DNC) controls the primaries then they can choose what ever candidates they want. Like how they chose Hillary despite Bernie having more support in 2016. This is why the DNC has stopped doing primaries.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Ultimately, the Democratic Party will only be changed through primaries.

Only so far as they continue to hold and respect them. We're now 0/3 on that front, so... yeah. It's not impossible, but they'll fight you every step of the way and then some. Creating/hijacking a third party and strategically contesting election will probably accomplish your goals faster. Remember that the only reason the GOP was taken over twice was because the party leadership approved of it.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago

Yeah people forget that the Democrat party doesn't need to even hold primaries, let alone respect the outcome. The DNC admitted to pushing Hillary to the forefront and were the ones that dragged Biden out of retirement because it seemed like Bernie might win the second time. The good politicians seem like exceptions.

Need to start promoting working families type party.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I'm not talking about Presidential primaries. I'm talking about state and local. Make it so the Democratic Party is full of progressives, socialists, social democrats, whatever your favorite brand of left-wing politics is. I'd be dammed careful about communists because that word is a fucking non-starter with the American electorate. Hell socialism is as well but it's not as poisonous as communism. When the party is full of... I don't know the proper term because every word I think to use (leftist? Lefties, maybe?) has been co-opted to mean a specific ideology. But make it so the Democratic Party as a whole leans further left, and those people have to be tapped to fill key roles because their presence is so large.

You are absolutely wrong about creating/hacking third party. Ross Perot couldn't pull it off despite spending about 80% what the major parties spent and capturing nearly 19% of votes in a vastly more friendly media environment. In order to achieve just that lofty level of irrelevance, a third party candidate would have to spend about $350 million and buy Fox News or Facebook. Third party isn't going to happen. Presidential primary isn't the place to start.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not just presidential matters. Local and state are much less fucked with. A 3rd party in first past the post just creates a split of neolib/socialists while the fascists remain united. Division in the American system is just a way to have the other party win. Republicans allowed the Tea party because that is what they wanted as well. Neolibs won't allow a split progressive/socialist with the exception of Bernie (because how do you fuck with Vermont).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Time for the neoliberal world order to end

Monkey’s paw curls

We now have a fascist world order.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] myrmidex@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed.

The democrat dinosaurs will panic, telling us the large donations will dry up, without which a campaign cannot be won.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Then we need to remind them that they're not doing a whole lot of winning at the moment.
If I want a paycheck I have to do my job, if I don't do my job I won't get paid.
If they want donations they're going to have to earn with with actions, not plans or promises.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 109 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t see people screaming at Bernie, AOC or Tim Walz. Wonder why that is…. Oh maybe it’s because they’re actually willing to notice the frustrations of their base.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Wait you want us to fight for your rights, like you elected us to do? I dunno, that sounds like effort. It's much easier to agree to what Republicans want and it theoretically looks good on paper that we wanna work with Fascists. Maybe we'll get some of their voters this time!"

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

"I know we campaigned on fighting fascism but that was more of a 'if we win' thing"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 102 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Lately my emotions have tended toward anger at the apathetic middle, not the cartoon villains of the Penguin Administration.

I know it’s a minority view but I blame all this on the nice normal people that thought they had better things to do than pay attention to politics.

If you do not see the need for aggressive responses to lawlessness, you let this happen and I find you boring.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 week ago (23 children)

This has been my position since I was a teenager: centrists are the weak underbelly because they can't pick a side and just want a middle ground.

Great sentiment, but you never have a side, a cause, and your "meaning" is always shifting to placate everyone else in the name of middleness.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 79 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"We've tried nothing, and we're all out of ideas."- The Democratic Party

[–] Vari@lemm.ee 48 points 1 week ago (4 children)

“But please donate to my campaign to STOP this. We will soon, I promise”

[–] VitoRobles 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

My god I am so sick of the emails.

I used to get emails like "Contribute to X because I will fight for our schools to provide school lunches to everyone!" And I'd donate.

Now, the emails are just "Donald wants to kill education. GIVE ME MONEY."

So you can use that money to buy another sign that says "Pweeze stop"?

[–] middgatsby@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The amount of “gib monies plz” messages I got infuriated me. Like you aren’t doing diddly squat why would I ?!?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Another constituent, Donya Williams, complained Ivey didn’t know the people in his district well enough — because he admitted earlier that he didn’t know who popular podcaster Joe Rogan was until the middle of the 2024 presidential campaign.

This explains so much. They are as ignorant of the current state of things as the "apolitical" voters who thought Trump would be fine this time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Ocasio-Cortez/Sanders 2028

Democrats: No we need to do this

This is why we lose. Fucking unite for something, geez

[–] C45513@lemm.ee 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

if Americans are going to just sit and wait, the US won't be recognizable in 4 years, and there sure as hell won't be a free and fair election

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Many Americans are not. There’s protests happening everyday, across the country. It’s, not being talked about but it’s absolutely happening.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thepresentpast@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I think Walz/Ocasio-Cortez would be a much more popular and palatable suggestion for the electorate, even though I personally prefer your proposal

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I feel that Sanders is probably too old and that he can pass the torch on at the next election. It's sad, but I still don't think we need an 80 year old running for office.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think we may may finally be getting our message across. Here's why:

Last night, Adam Schiff, one of the Democratic lawmakers I respect the most, was on Kimmel, and was very rough not just on the HitlerPig Crime Family, but also Chuck Schumer.

But what really struck me, was that the very honorable, polite, and respectful Adam Schiff took the opportunity to basically say "Fuck You" directly to the president - TWICE!

Kimmel asked him if he had said thank you to HitlerPig, and Schiff said he used a different two-word phrase, but one of the words was "You," and everyone got it and laughed. At the end of his interview, he made another joke that was another very obvious disguised "Fuck You."

They were obviously baiting HitlerPig into a tirade, but seeing Schiff go on national TV and saying Fuck You to HitlerPig twice marks a very new direction in messaging for the Democratic party. I hope this is the beginning of pivoting from appeasement to Hard Ball.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Schumer and Pelosi don't have street fighting skills, they are from the era where Republicans weren't all violent dixiecrat trash.

Schiff and the newer ones don't bring harsh words to gunfights.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Democrats hit 27% approval this week...

That's ironically the level Schumer said Dems would start doing stuff when Trump hit.

No one likes neoliberals, or their policies

It's just not an effective political strategy, regardless of how you try to look at it. Even ignoring popularity with voters, even when neoliberals get elected, they refuse to do anything.

The entire purpose of it is doing nothing, it's political nihilism.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chickens can at least peck a bit. These dems aren't even that tough

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] F_OFF_Reddit@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well holding signs and doing nothing didn't work?

[–] faceula@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (9 children)

May I suggest a major and I mean major leaflet campaign?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

They need to understand that they are fighting for the country. And when they don't treat the Republicans and billionaires as the enemy they deprive us of the power to fight at the ballot box.

So we have to go to the soapbox. Like lemmy.

And when that fails, many of us (not me) will find they have nothing else to lose and go to the ammo box, like mangione is accused of.

And the rest of us will go to the jury box and vote not guilty.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›