this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38631 readers
184 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 month ago

Americans won’t be saved by the Democrats.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stupid mother fuckers.

Anyone old enough to remember knows - politicians have been stupid and reactionary about public access to the internet from its earliest days.

Section 230 of the DMCA is probably the only reason social media as we know it was able to emerge past infancy. (You could argue about whether we might want to put that cat back in the bag, but the earliest discussion forums, leading to sites like Lemmy and Reddit, also could not have existed as we all knew them.)

And frankly, this looks like another part of the march to oligarchy to me. When the only social media sites that can exist are those with owners that have big enough pockets to hire enough people to become responsible for what users post and aggressively control it... (or, shudder what if the end goal is literally nationalized social media)

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I feel like the whole point is to shut down the fediverse and similar alternatives to the capitalist cage.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is what "vote blue no matter who" gets you: Trump.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's somehow worse than the title suggests. People should read the article. I am getting sick of saying that, but each awful thing being done recently has so many implications that just can't fit in a title.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

And the linked Bluesky post.