743

14 big landlords used software to collude on rent prices, DC lawsuit says (arstechnica.com)

submitted 8 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

64 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] BT_7274@lemmy.world 181 points 8 months ago

I work in this industry. The biggest problem with the software is it gave the management companies instant access to everyone else’s current prices. The industry has used “market surveys” for years but you had to actually call around and gather those prices yourself. It’s a very time consuming process so many only did their surveys sporadically.

With the software you had instant access to current price data and everyone pretty much raised their prices to match the market average. Then the newer/fancier properties saw the new higher average and thought “We’re a better property so we can raise our prices above the competition.” Which then led to a higher average that the rest then met again. Rinse and repeat and you have a de facto price fixing cartel.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 104 points 8 months ago

This is why 'competition lowers prices' is a load of bullshit.

Ya'll ever seen Walgreens and CVS? Same prices, right next to each other.

What about 2 gas station on opposite sides of the street, charging the exact same price for their fuel?

It's a gentleman's agreement at best, and a cartel at worst. Either way, no business is going to start an 'undercut war' because they don't want their opponents to do the same thing.

Here's another fine example: Nvidia and AMD. AMD releases worse GPUs, then just piggybacks off of Nvidia's ridiculous prices.

It's all a game to funnel as much money as possible to as few people as possible.

[-] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 53 points 8 months ago

competition only lowers prices if supply isn't limited sadly. And due to how the housing system works, that would virtually never happen.

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

It could. If something causes housing to be less in demand. Like negative population growth.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

A duopoly is not a competitive market. It's only when you have lots of suppliers and lots of purchasers that a market is actually competitive.

[-] BT_7274@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

While true, there are some markets where these properties are fighting for a very finite supply of tenants. If they see they are lagging behind in their leasing, they really don’t have any other choice than to lower their prices to make sure they don’t have any vacant units. The industry term is called “vacancy loss” and it’s the one thing the upper management money men actually fear. A unit without someone inside it is literally bleeding money from them so they’ll do nearly anything to fill it.

Hopefully soon they won’t be able to share their prices as easily and they’ll have to fight for their lives by lowering prices to fill vacancies before another property snaps them up.

[-] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

You're right, except in 99.9% of these situations they don't ACTUALLY lower prices. They just offer a "signing bonus" like 1 month free rent, then charge just as much as everyone else for the other 11 months.

That signing bonus doesn't appear in this tool, so prices don't actually go down.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I had one landlord offer me $200 off my security deposit if I would clean the two-foot-high mound of actual dogshit from the kitchen before moving in. Like, not even a break on the actual rent, just a lowering of the deposit and she thought I'd be too stupid to know the difference. TBF she probably never returned anybody's deposit so in a sense she really would have been saving me money.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

there are some markets where these properties are fighting for a very finite supply of tenants.

True, but these aren't usually the markets in major cities. It's why rent is actually affordable outside of them.

[-] foyrkopp@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Office buildings would like a word with you.

It's the reason so many large corporations a talking about RTO, office real estate prices are set to plummet if everyone's keeping to WFH.

Sadly, that's only tangentially related to housing (although I believe to have read something about new subsidies for landlords converting office space into appartments).

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (9 replies)

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago

Now as punishment, reset rent prices back a few years.

[-] stella@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago

This is the true affirmative action.

[-] jackalope@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Reparations not affirmative action.

[-] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 13 points 8 months ago

The 2020 Revenge Tour will continue until ~~morale improves~~ we decide we're done bleeding the plebs dry.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago

Why do we have landlord monopolies

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 34 points 8 months ago

my landlord owns 1400 properties. it's fucking insane.

[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

There's companies that own over 100k single family homes, while regularly circle jerking each other on linked in about how "they are dedicated to provided affordable housing to those in need"

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 8 months ago

Man those were some bad typos, I can't believe they missed them in the final edit.

It's supposed to read: We are dedicated to prying affordable housing away from those in need for our profit.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 32 points 8 months ago

And are rent prices actually going to come down?

Survey: nope!

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

I thought basically every landlord now uses some software to make sure they charge “market prices” even though their properties are trash.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Sounds like you're saying every landlord should be taken out the back and beaten.

[-] theuberwalrus@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

That's a weird way to spell guillotine

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I don't have a guillotine. But everyone has a beating stick of some kind somewhere, and if not they're easy and cheap to make.

[-] greybeard@lemmy.one 4 points 8 months ago

Have you seen the rent on beating sicks these days?

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Sad, back in my day, people could craft their own.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

God, I want to become a mayor or governor or something so I can push a rule through that says only 5% of single-family properties in any jurisdiction are allowed to be rentals, and landlords have to purchase what amounts to "tokens" from the city that are priced inverse proportionally to the ratio of tenant income to rent to be able to keep the rental. Also, wage discrimination is not allowed. If a potential tenant comes forward with proof, the landleech has to prove that they did not discriminate or they will not be allowed to purchase tokens the next year.

Idk, something. Some limitations on the number that any individual can hold in a city and punish them for overcharging.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There's something to this. Sounds like taxi medallions.

I would settle for a law requiring owners of rental properties to be residents of the same state so they can be properly hauled into court when they break laws.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Screw "same state", make it "same municipality".

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 8 months ago

I've seriously been considering checking out what it would take to build homes and just make a company that only builds starter homes that can't be sold to corporations. Fuck this system running out of control... Rent through the roof and no housing for the poor/lower middle class....

I absofuckinglutley do not in the slightest bit care about being rich, if the company could survive and support a "normal" life for me that would be more than enough.

It's absolutely absurd that we allow the market to run rampant like this and just shrug it off. "Housing crisis? I don't see one, we're selling large houses like hot cakes! Most well over asking price!"

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

So something like a for (ethical) profit Habitat for Humanity? I have had a similar fantasy, start companies in each of the major problem sectors that operate openly and honestly only slightly above solvency and offer quality at good prices just to drive the greedy fucks out of business, then I just stay there. I don't take advantage of the monopoly, I just live as I have been. I envision putting the actual material and labor cost of each product on the packaging in plain English. Kinda like a dietary and ingredients info table for a television. Don't put in spyware, don't put in random hidden cameras behind a screen, don't take permissions on devices so I can listen in on people. Do a bank that micro-lends at a 1% markup from the interest rates on my savings accounts. Make everything repairable and put a wiring schematic on the inside of the case if it is a large enough unit. Etc. You know, be ethical in the way I treat my employees and customers. I know, radical concept. I guess that is just the effect of having a math degree, I'm used to radical concepts.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

Humans are cannibals.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023

743 points (98.7% liked)

News

21742 readers

3517 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world