In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
But the state Supreme Court, which is currently controlled 4-3 by liberal justices, declined to take the case as an original action. The court gave no rationale for its decision
I don't even know how this isn't clearly against the law. They gave no rationale. Was it fear, incompetence or complicity?
I think the silence speaks very clearly on it. Personally I think it is fear.
Cowards and traitors
Liberals currently hold a 4-3 majority on the court. All four liberal justices have endorsed Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, the Democratic-backed candidate.
We need a third party or infiltration.
yellow bellied snakes! if it was Joe blow you would of locked them in chains and dragged them into that court house. tear them down people ! the only way this bull shit ends is if we hold them accountable now! do you want a country or do you want a kingdom with peasants and tyrant kings?
You fuckers had one job. ONE JOB!
Okay, how many Wisconsinites can we mobilize? To the streets!
So string them up TOO.
With the election being Tuesday, this wasn't going to be litigated with this court anyway. This may look like cowardice, but it's pragmatism.
That's what cowards often say, yes.
Provide your evidence to the contrary instead of an ad hominem.
And how, exactly, do you expect that to happen, coward?
Were this a community I modded, you'd already be taking a vacation. Responding to a request for data after an ad hominem by doubling down with an ad hominem is not how Beehaw works. That's not be(e)ing nice.
Interesting that you don't apply your own intellectual or behavioral standards to yourself, coward.
iF I WaS a MoD hERe
I am a mod here. Just not in this community. You've now tripled down. I was originally suggesting a seven day ban here, but I'm going to move that suggestion to 30 sitewide. By all means, grab a shovel and keep going.
What does the law actually say? Can he pay them for voting, as long as he's not paying them to vote a particular way?
As I understand it, the clear answer to your question is “no he cannot.”