this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
258 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

9366 readers
2692 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago

We just got rid of the carbon rebate (clowns that we are). We’d better fucking make the cost of industry polluting very high.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

But the tax is axed, right?

 

Short sighted fucking idiots.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago

Thanks to everyone forcing return to office! Great job guys!

[–] wrassleman76@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

I need a truck for my job. I had a 2011 Ford Ranger for YEARS. When that kicked the bucket in 2022, I was forced to by an F-150 and it's an absolute monstrosity. It is massive and has LESS box space than my Ranger did. I don't why it's near impossible to buy a small truck with a full sized box in North America.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

Something else at play here is accuracy in reporting. Canada has strict reporting regulations, which means the pollution reported matches the actual pollution pretty well (but this ignores that Canada releases a LOT of CO2 into the atmosphere through natural processes as well — forest fires and permafrost methane off gassing for example).

Also, worth noting that where I live in Canada, there’s lots of public transit, minimal food waste, single use plastics aren’t legal to sell, and neither are single use plastic shopping/grocery bags. A lot of people drive electric vehicles, and electricity is generated by hydroelectricity.

Most of the pollution (and there IS a lot) is industrial, a lot of it related to tar sands oil extraction.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We have been for a long time, this is not new.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would say that we continue to do nothing despite the dire forthcoming consequences, and that should be reported on ad nauseum.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Maybe Danielle Smith could fly around the US a few more times.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As I suspected, Australia celebrates overshoot day before Canada (in other words manages to be a worse polluter).

Interestingly, Uruguay, followed by Indonesia are best.

https://overshoot.footprintnetwork.org/newsroom/country-overshoot-days/

This data is expressed as a date. From the site:

Every year, a Country Overshoot Day marks the date when the planet’s annual biocapacity budget would be used up if everyone on Earth lived at the same level of consumption as the residents of that particular country.

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not all countries represented. Would like to see every country on there.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's because not every country produces the data. We don't (yet) have a "global" order that requires a minimum standard of compliance and at the rate that the Orange is destroying everything he touches, I doubt we'll see it in our lifetimes.

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

OK. I though it was a calculation based off of reported and estimated CO2 emmisions.

[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Soon to be corrected. As the USA's population seeks asylum, the per capita pollution will naturally be less. Two problems solved.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good old statistics! Always solving the big problems by showing the data in a different way.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Solving problems the Excel way.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

“The solution to pollution is dilution”

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably similar issues to Australia. Large country, small population.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but in both cases a majority of the population lives in the moderately dense line between the two major cities in the south east.

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Without knowing too much about Canada, probably also not enough investment into rail transport?

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Worse, they have been taking after the US and only allowing single family homes and car based infrastructure. They also elect idiots like Doug Ford.

Doug: “I feel so safe on this bike in the city of Toronto”. Also Doug: “my commute is extended a few minutes, fuck the people that actually live in the city, I’ll remove the bike lanes with fake data and by riling up other lazy fucks like myself so I can drive my car from the suburbs into the city quicker”

There is a whole channel “not just bikes” about non car based transportation and public spaces that commonly cites Canada as basically US 2.0 (from a guy that used to live in Canada before, and still has family there).

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

The only top hdi country without HSR.

[–] rice@lemmy.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's why USA gets so much metal from canada, so you guys can pollute and usa looks greener.

You can see the so2 levels on windy and no2 for that matter all over the mines up there.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't think the US cares that much about looking (or being) greener

[–] rice@lemmy.org 1 points 1 day ago

well they did, but now definitely not.

load more comments
view more: next ›