[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

I absolutely agree. I'll repeat a comment I made separately.

I’ll repost a comment I made before again here:

If you have half the population each have 1 investment property. You must have the other half renters. You literally want to create two classes. Those with investment properties and those with no property. One class above another. You’re just using billionaires as a shield. You want to put yourself in a class above other people.

We should all work so that each person has one home.

And the “I don’t want to work until I die” should be covered by social insurance/social security instead of making someone else a renter.

context: https://lemmy.ca/comment/4927203

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 months ago

I'll repost a comment I made before again here:

If you have half the population each have 1 investment property. You must have the other half renters. You literally want to create two classes. Those with investment properties and those with no property. One class above another. You’re just using billionaires as a shield. You want to put yourself in a class above other people.

We should all work so that each person has one home.

And the “I don’t want to work until I die” should be covered by social insurance/social security instead of making someone else a renter.

context: https://lemmy.ca/comment/4927203

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

Well .NET is dead now so I guess .COM and .ORG are dead too?

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 51 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The original press release from MIT news is here: https://news.mit.edu/2023/using-ai-mit-researchers-identify-antibiotic-candidates-1220

Paper the press release refers to: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/153216

The lab this is being worked on: https://www.collinslab.mit.edu/

The paper as listed on the lab's website: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c264953620b850c9fb03732/t/658331812865e60a33af40ea/1703096709558/nature_wong.pdf

The audacious project: https://www.audaciousproject.org/grantees/collins-lab

I think we should cultivate a habit of linking to the original material

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago

htttps://lemmy.ca

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago

If passive income you getting income without working then who's working without income.

This whole thread thoroughly convinced me of george's ideas.

As Adam Smith said

As soon as the land of any country has all become private property, the landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for its natural produce

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago

If you have half the population each have 1 investment property. You must have the other half renters. You literally want to create two classes. Those with investment properties and those with no property. One class above another. You're just using billionaires as a shield. You want to put yourself in a class above other people.

We should all work so that each person has one home.

And the "I don't want to work until I die" should be covered by social insurance/social security instead of making someone else a renter.

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 17 points 7 months ago

You contradicted yourself. Op can't get a starter home but the starter home he would have bought is held hostage by the "smol" landlord. Pick one.

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You're solution doesn't solve the thing you're trying to solve.

E.g.

There is a "mom & pop" landlord with just 10 properties. But they don't purchase anymore. Now there are 1000 such landlords. The landlords all incorporate and create a REIT that owns 10,000 homes. You have created a "megacorp" through just "mom and pop" landlords.

What is the difference?

The true answer is the abolition of landlords in favour of housing coops and community land trusts.

To prove a point to you I'll ask you a question.

What is the difference between the goal of small landlords vs REITs and "megacorps" represented by row 4 of the graph found here?:

https://www.smalllandlords.org/about-small-landlords/

The group is a small landlord group from my city.

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago

Why don't we just take investor money and invest in it ourselves?

Others have already pointed out that the covid vaccine was publicly funded ergo the benefit should be publicly owned

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Then never in your life go to a fast food joint at 10 am on a Tuesday.

In terms of pure dollar amount, it should by adjusted by PPP. It should be a wage to live off of. I'm in engineering, a few years into my career, I am well paid but I should be paid more, relative to CoL. I should be doing very well even if I have a family not doing well because I don't have one.

[-] twopi@lemmy.ca 22 points 9 months ago

Carbon sequestration is not possible right now or even for the foreseeable future.

Forcing jets to use renewable resources is a good one be should aim to ban private short and medium haul flights in general.

1
submitted 2 years ago by twopi@lemmy.ca to c/embedded_prog@lemmy.ml

This is probably meta, but I'd like to know what are the boards in the picture in the banner of the sublemmy?

view more: next ›

twopi

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF