this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
995 points (99.7% liked)

politics

22913 readers
3904 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rustic_Fry@literature.cafe 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

An insane list of demands like that should fall under the "We don't negotiate with terrorists" clause right?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

Well, an insane list of demands aimed at an international school that derives a huge amount of its income from foreign students and a reputation as a global leader in law and commerce. Harvard's admins aren't "Going Woke". They're going into survival mode.

They're also likely looking at the bloodbath at Columbia as the admin over there bend itself into a pretzel to comply with these demands, gets their funding gutted anyway, and turns the student body into either El Salvadorian inmates or white nationalist freaks. Clearly there's no upside to compliance. Trump never goes away, he just comes back with a longer and more vile list of demands.

[–] mobotsar@sh.itjust.works 22 points 18 hours ago

Harvard has its own issues of course, but don't let that distract you from the fact that this thing it's done is the right thing.

[–] auginator@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Well they have balls not like other universities

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 4 points 12 hours ago

One would hope that the wealthiest university in the country would have the minerals to tell the Trump regime to piss off.

[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago

The letter that they sent Harvard was mental. Demanding wholesale replacement of the staff and students, removing the human rights curriculum, removing any cultural studies, a full mask ban bc only ICE get to wear masks now apparently, and a tattletale hotline. That letter is so up its own ass. Glad they published it.

[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 372 points 1 day ago (11 children)

FINALLY. One university with the balls to stand up to Trump.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

Georgetown has been out ahead of this for weeks. But they get no press because they're (a) not Harvard and (b) not humiliating themselves in compliance rituals like Columbia, so they aren't as exciting to cover.

You've also got schools down in Texas - A&M and UT particularly - that have already been fully integrated into Governor Abbott's brand of Lone Star Fascism that there's little to report. Just a bunch of admins saying, in thick German accents, that everything is normal and there's nothing to see.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Columbia looking twice as pathetic now. I hope this catches on.

[–] _void_ptr_@lemm.ee 6 points 17 hours ago

Dartmouth too. One of trump's rnc ghouls is working with her directly.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 140 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I don't think all the people I was telling understand how much money Harvard has.

It's ... Way way more than it appears on paper.

They have, over the last 40 years or so, systematically bought commercial real estate in Boston, left it vacant to devalue the housing property in the neighborhood, then bought houses in the neighborhoods, bulldozed, expanded. They own way more of Allston than people realize. Let's not even talk about their endowment, which can pay for all students tuition on interest alone.

Here's a fun one.

42.3580140, -71.1385711

Try and figure out what that building is, who owns it, what it's for. It's like 5 acres. In the middle of a major capital city.

Yeah. Good luck. (P.S. it's Harvard)

Now note proximity to Harvard Stadium.

Harvard runs shit. In broad daylight secrecy. Within a democratic stronghold.

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Scott Galloway on YouTube often mentions this on his podcasts. That Harvard and a few others have turned from being a university with money to a private equity fund with some students.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago (9 children)

What’s the point of sitting on a $53B endowment if you’re not going to use it? Losing $9B in contracts to fight fascism is worth every penny.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Likely because their endowment is large enough to not need federal funds.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

I don't think Columbia's hard up for cash either, but they folded like a cardboard lawn chair

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

They have "Russian asset go fuck yourself" money.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Collectivists supporting billionaires and running defense for them online in 3...2...1

The stunlock intensifies

load more comments
view more: next ›