this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
996 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

14336 readers
2960 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (24 children)

don't beekeepers use smoke or some such?

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Like most others I have not read the article. But someone please answer me this:

If the bees fell asleep, then why didn't the fire kill them? I can accept that insects don't have lungs, I mean some people are doing well without hearts... but am I supposed to accept that bees are also immune to fire damage?

[–] Plaidboy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

The bees were on a different lower down roof from the main roof (which is the one that burned). The article notes that bee wax melts at 70C and they didn't see any of that under the hives, so they know temperatures stayed below that. So the bees were likely only exposed to some smoke and maybe some slightly elevated temperatures.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why doesn't the damaging and hot particulate matter in smoke do any harm to or otherwise clog up their spiracles like it does to the inner lining of lungs? I gather lungs are wet and also very delicate, but if they're directly oxygenating their organs through these spiracles eventually it must get to somewhere wet and delicate for the smoke to get in and potentially harm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

am i the only one who notices that this logic makes no sense? it doesnt matter that they have no lungs, they still are susceptible to both heat and airborn toxins, they perform gas exchange. They lived because the heat and smoke were below lethal toxic levels for them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I remember the first time I heard bugs dont have lungs. Like wtf? Just no internal ventilation pumping air as needed. Seems wierd but also thx God. They are annoying enough.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

They also have no blood or blood vessels, just a little heart and blood-like stuff splashing around.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago

We should all aspire to be more like bees.

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

They breathe their own farts. Well.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›