this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
6 points (80.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9675 readers
55 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

On a recent test run, the train sprinted to record-breaking speeds of 281 miles per hour, making it the fastest train in the world.

That's not even close to the current record, which is 375 mph: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_speed_record

Once completed, engineers hope the maglev will reach 621 mph

Yeah, that's a big "if" right there.

I'm all for high speed rail and I hope they succeed, but this article is terrible.

[–] Athena5898@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we really need to start shoving the noses of Democrats on how much China is beating our ass in just about everything in regard to infrastructure and going green. Pride is about the only thing i can think of that might make the Dems do something other than the barest of bare minimums on these things and point out how the supposedly "bad" country is doing better then us might get people to think. idk anything to challenge American Exceptionalism

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 2 points 1 year ago

I think you're oversimplifying things, Trump wasn't doing more than the bare minimum either. We really need to fuck off all these political systems that prop up politicians that have never lived with their constituents and start sending inept and lying politicians to jail.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Mon dieu, faster than the TGV? I think not sacrebleu!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One of those crashing while going "faster than an airplane" would seem more catastrophic than an airplane crashing.

Are these bullet trains safer than planes or as dangerous as regular trains?

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

These also have less probability of crashing than commercial airplanes.

[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trains derail on occasion. Planes crash on occasion. But at least with trains we're not accelerating the death of the planet

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But at least with trains we’re not accelerating the death of the planet

A mag lev train doing 500+mph is going to need a lot more energy than a normal train. It will probably be less than the plane but I'm thinking it won't be as much less as you might think.

Thae train is also doing those speeds at sea level vs the plane doing them at 35,000ft or higher, where there's less than 1/4 the atmosphere to fight.

Edit: for the record I'm in favor of more trains but I don't think these will be that much better than planes with both in cruise, however, they both have different situations where they're more suited with some overlap.

[–] flux@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trains don't leave exhaust in the upper parts of the atmosphere, though, and depending on how the electricity was created, it could be neither did its energy source—though I suppose there's no avoiding that manufacturing any kind of plant and the train itself did cause emissions.

[–] matthewtoad43@climatejustice.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@flux @QuinceDaPence Concrete and steel (for stations, track, etc) matter. So does the electricity used to maintain stations, not just propel the train. So lifecycle emissions of a train are immensely complicated, plus then you get into how to route a new rail line without destroying too many ecosystems.

Even so, clean electricity is the easy bit compared to making planes clean. More trains please.

[–] agarorn@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

As far as I am aware no country on earth is CO2 neutral, so for these trains the emissions are still positive.