this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
70 points (93.8% liked)

Slop.

570 readers
402 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thallo@hexbear.net 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Upstanding dem who happens to be Asian tries to so something positive, and Hexbears will call it "Kabuki"

Smh bad look tankies.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If he introduces a m4a bill next week - that could be very dangerous. I could die laughing.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Might fuck around and introduce a resolution declaring Donald Trump a big poopyhead

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

...in a diaper!

[–] regul@hexbear.net 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Even in their wildest dreams they are proposing market-based "solutions" and public subsidy of private ownership.

[–] abc@hexbear.net 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

you have to understand that the remaining like 1200 days left in Trump's presidency are the Democrats ONLY opportunity to campaign for 2028. Unfortunately for Cory Booker, he blew his metaphorical 2008 Obama load early with the 'omg i think i beat storm thurmond's record for filibustering if you ignore the fact i was not actually filibustering anything' stunt - a smarter candidate would have waited til early 2027 to pull that stunt.

Are you a democrat seeking re-election in 2028? DM me, I can work with you to ensure we get you in office. You WILL have to spend the next 3 years making performative gestures to the non-fascist public at large but you WILL get to go 'I do recall saying I would close Guantanamo Bay on the campaign trail, but unfortunately we just don't have the numbers in the house/senate to get it passed...no I don't think I can do it with an Executive Order because the Senate Parmesan-reggiano will get mad at me' once elected biden-troll obama-medal

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If they called it the Combatting the Homelessness ~problem~ Act, they could probably get it to pass

[–] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago

Final Solution to the Homlessness Question Act

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Edit: Never mind.

---

This is a test.

This is a ^test^.

This is a ~test~.

[–] Balefirex@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

It's right there! Haha. I knew that. This is all a bit!

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago

Always when they don't have any power.

[–] RiotDoll@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The sweet spot for a democrat, whose donors and masters are the exact same people that empower republicans, plus or minus the privileged and empowered folks who fall outside the category of "human" to the card carrying fascist, is to be able to say to your constituents "I'm trying to do something! Look! See at all this Trying I'm doing?! Aren't you so grateful I'm here and Trying So Hard. Alas, republicans.... I said, excuse me sir...[Peanuts adult noises start to drown out their voice] ...Reaching across the aisle like an adult in the room... [somebody who still only gets their news from MSNBC starts clapping like a trained seal] ...Vote for Mueller for the grand bargain in the West Wing"

But then they also need to go to their office and assure their real masters that no, they're doing exactly nothing, because they know their performance is fated to fail and be forgotten, with zero chance of ever having the force of law, nor being interesting enough to kick off a movement or popular support of any magnitude. Then they do some insider trading, because they know what the republicans are actually doing, and they get a fat enough paycheck to be fine with it, because everybody sells out, because all humans are basically the same, and on equal footing, and the incidence of benevolent principled behavior is low enough to be statistically irrelevant, because the world we live in destroys anybody with those tendencies, or buries them.

That's the elected-lib sweet-spot. Demonstrate "value" to credulous constituents through meaningless performative action you know won't amount to anything, tell them to vote harder about their increasing suffering, and then go to the guy who owns you so hard his fist might as well be deep up your ass and assure them you've done absolutely nothing to threaten their interests.

It's a lot of work, but hell, it pays the bills and you get to feel superior to the people you dupe every two to six years.

[–] Castor_Troy@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If Trump can get away with so much unconstitutional shit, why haven't the Dems ever done something like this (I know). Just ram through housing and healthcare for all by executive order and don't listen to the courts.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

Just ram through housing and healthcare for all by executive order and don't listen to the courts.

Biden could have done that last year after Kamala lost. The GOP justices issued their immunity ruling which gave the president (in theory) incredible powers for "official acts". It will always be hilarious to me that after the election - Biden did nothing with those powers. When the justices ruled they did so for a possible Trump presidency. Biden might as well not even existed. They ignored him entirely because they knew he wouldn't do a damn thing. And any sane leftist (including me) knew that too. But it's still funny to me. It's like if you had Thor's Hammer right at your side but you didn't even consider using it because of the fucking norms.

[–] EllenKelly@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Isnt this almost exactly the kind of thing communists would push if they were elected? But i suppose a communist would do so under the understanding it will fail, and be ready to make a point about it

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What he's doing is just another version of this...

liberalism

if they were elected

If I was a congressperson - I think what I would focus on would be smaller stuff that - at least in theory - had a tiny chance of passing. Off the top of my head... I dunno... maybe a 100% ban on congresspeople trading stocks, etc. Right now congresspeople can do insider trading with zero worry of facing any criminal or legal problems.

One thing is absolute certain - the dems would try to fuck me every single way - every single day. On my personal website - I'd have all sorts of stuff like a Insider Trading Tracker. I assume if I put that on my .gov account - in a day or so the dems would try to use procedural tricks to force me to remove it.

[–] Lussy@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If I was a congressperson - I think what I would focus on would be smaller stuff that - at least in theory - had a tiny chance of passing.

Oh come, let’s at least be intellectually honest here, the legitimate critique against dems was that they were getting no where either ways so why not go big with ‘cancel all student debt’ vs ‘cancel 10k’.

‘End homelessness’ is a good message.

*This isn’t an endorsement of democrats. Should this politician come out the next day saying ‘End homelessness… in Beverly Hills’, I will not be held responsible for treason.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

‘End homelessness’ is a good message.

It's performative bullshit when they are out of power and can do fuck all. There will be more of this in 2026 and 2028 before the elections. "Elect me and I will put the Fill-in-the-Blank-Sounds-Good! bill on the floor. We will work for you America!" After the election? Crickets.

If there's a serious of bona fide miracles and in 2029 the dems control congress and the presidency - I can guarantee you that there will be no* stuff like "Housing for All!" or "$17 (minimum wage) for All!", etc. They will say you can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. We campaign in poetry but we govern in prose. And the difficult realities of politics mean fuck-fuck-fuckity fuck-fuck-fuck...

---

Ninja edit

* Well, Bernie and AOC will talk about it a lot but get absolutely nowhere.

[–] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago

Lucy holding the football is a good message

[–] kittin@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

A communist would do it when they had power, not just when they don’t.

[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago