this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1785 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

7570 readers
1061 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nathanjent@programming.dev 17 points 2 months ago

After he rolls this out he'll start pushing to drop the child tax credit arguing, "they already get so much investment up front. They're so greedy."

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

He should know that you can't buy that many diapers with $5k.

Unless he doesn't do his own diaper shopping I guess...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I wonder how they'll make it so it only applies to "Aryan" children. Hitler did the same shit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

They won't call them Aryan, but it will be the same shit. They'll call it something like Christian babies or some nonsense; then use that as a smokescreen for their racism.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Daycare cost $2k a month

Is that for real? That's more than (many) private schools in Europe.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A 2 bedroom 1 bathroom house in Toronto costs more than a castle in france

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (18 children)

Well to be fair, that's what it costs in many European countries, too.

That's why many women don't work. The cost is basically as high as a low paying or part time job.

That's why everyone needs free daycare. That will generate a higher GDP for everyone.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

$5,000 is a lot to those braindead morons who insist that "nobody wants to work" because they're still living comfortably off of a few $1,400 checks from half a decade ago...

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Why only after the baby is born? Is there something significant about the moment of birth or something?

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, clearly an embryo/fetus is a child with rights at the moment of conception (/s), so why wait until after delivery?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How about some of that socialism for the rest of us, and not just for breeders and soybean farmers?

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Paying desperate people to produce corpo slaves is the furthest thing from socialism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I feel like that's more than $5k in the picture if they're all $20 bills.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CheeryLBottom@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We need to feed the ones we have now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

What are the odds this is just Clinton's $5,000 Baby Bond, which was just giving them a fund at birth that they can cash out when they turn 18?

Except this time there's no guardrails and he can give it to all his cryptobro friends.

[–] Rawdogg@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The average cost of delivering a baby in the US, including pre- and post-delivery expenses, is roughly $18,865. However, this figure can vary significantly, just gotta come up with the other 14000 dollars lol do Amerikans know other countries don't gouge their citizens for everything including birth? Land of the fee home of the slave

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pappabosley@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We had this in Australia for a while, where there was no hospital costs for birth, and almost 20 years ago, so it was a considerable help. The conservatives started claiming people were having babies just to get the money and then spending it on big TV's and other luxuries.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 2 months ago

Sounds like classic Conservative projection.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Have 4 kids.

5k is couch money when you have kids. It'll maybe take care of a few months of daycare. Now if you're on gov assistance and make next to nothing? This will be great, but don't expect to get a job or climb out of poverty with 5k. A kid will eat that up super fast.

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

So weird. These are the same imbiciles complaining about welfare babies.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Are these those welfare babies Republicans always screeeched about?

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 months ago

More ineffective Band-Aids.

The core issues never get addressed. Prices keep going up.

And those issues will get worse under a corpo like Trump.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Fash privileging heteronormativity in order to increase servitude and hasten planetary destruction? Fairly normal in our culture.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Barley_Man@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Spending money on families hasn't been shown to help in any way whatsoever in increasing the birth rate. You have countries with close to free day care and generous monthly child subsidies with the same or even much lower fertility rate as countries that give just about nothing at all. I still support these kinds of policies just for the sake of helping families and their kids, but doing it for the only purpose of helping the fertility rate is futile. Honestly I don't think the government can do much at all to help the fertility rate. It's a cultural issue first and foremost. And the government can't (and I think shouldn't!) do much to change the culture of our society. You see people living in poverty with 9 kids just because they belong to a certain religious or ethnic group who values children above all else. That's the main issue. How important is children to the culture? Is it prestigious to be a dad or a mom? Is personal success measured in how you've built your family or is success measured in how much money you make?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They'll need a population boost after Trump deny's immigrants entrance into America.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›