this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
361 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

69845 readers
3878 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 99 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Waaaaaaaaay too expensive, but I'd love it if big eink displays became a thing, even with shit refresh rates, mostly because I want some for displaying Home Assistant dashboards.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

I bought a trmnl and it's pricey but works pretty good. I've mostly been using a few out-of-the-box plugins for it.

There is a selfhosted/offline version of the server you can run for it, so it can be 'offline' in theory. I keep meaning to mess with it more but haven't put the time aside.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.org 9 points 1 week ago

Or to hang on a home server rack displaying dashboards.

[–] hera@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago

Feel like we've been waiting a long time for it :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I’m thinking at those prices this is probably intended for corporations that absolutely need a readable display in bright sunlight areas but don’t really care about refresh rate or color depth.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago

I can see how this would be very attractive to a writer.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 10 points 1 week ago

Not necessarily just corporations, but certainly text-based workflows. I can see this being great if your day job is writing code, working on spreadsheets, editing documents, etc. In those use cases, framerate hardly matters. Would be great for reducing eye strain.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How many seconds per frame does it get?

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 28 points 1 week ago

Not sure yet, we're still waiting for the first frame to finish.

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 21 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If the answer matters then your use case isn’t this monitor’s use case. If you spend all day in Excel, or an IDE, something like that, then it could be awesome for eye strain reduction.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

I've never had eye strain from a CRT or LCD.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe in 30 years when the patents expire.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not going to happen. The fog is coming.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can guess what you are alluding to. But explain anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What is the refresh time? They carefully avoid mentioning that. There's a comparable Pimoroni monitor whose refresh takes 14 seconds so I'd call it a static display rather than a computer monitor.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The article mentions another display with a 33 Hz refresh rate. But be aware that there would be significant ghosting even just scrolling a page of text, more so than even a measly 33 Hz refresh rate would lead you to believe.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm happy with say 3 hz, fast enough to not be too annoying when flipping pages while reading. It's fine to not be good for video. What I really want is a 16 inch or so e-reader though.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'd really like a 20" or so e-ink screen as a second/third monitor. I'd have one for video and whatnot, and the other for text.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Boox Tab Ultra C aint half bad

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That is a video of a much smaller monitor. It does show reasonably responsive refresh. Do you have one of the 25.3 inch monitor described in the article?

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

Maybe it’d be useful as a low powered interactive kiosk display? Price needs to come down tremendously before this thing becomes competitive.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I remember when OLED was that extensive...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Obligatory Linus video for a similar, but not identical, monitor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVUxxn53mBE

This Dasung model is mentioned at the bottom of the article. TL;DW: These things have the exact list of drawbacks you think they do including miserable contrast, color accuracy so bad it's fallen off the bottom of the chart, a low refresh rate, and quite a bit of ghosting. So it's awful, but surprisingly not as awful as you'd think if your primary experience is an e-reader form the first couple of generations. Linus being Linus he does attempt to game on it and gets... a result... but this is a display technology with niche applications and still best suited to displaying mostly static content.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Looks awesome on the photo, but I guess I have better uses for such money and night sky and trees for enjoying what I see.

Also lower refresh rates are not such a terrible problem when it's not a CRT blinking in front of you.

Grainy look is kinda fine. That's about the "compromises" part.

So a cheaper one I'd probably use. Being part of some dream computer to be useful in transport, while walking, at home, with battery life longer than nuclear fallout effects and unbreakable box and EOL date of the kind castles in Europe have. Otherwise nah, many other things to break my eyes against.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

What's the refresh rate and can I play Hunt showdown on it? They say a similar model has a 33hz refresh rate but don't mention this model

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't know if you can play games on this, but I know you definitely won't want to.

load more comments (3 replies)

Please note that even at 30hz eink displays still have hundreds of milliseconds of latency

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›