-35

i don't want to offend anyone, but some open source/privacy enthusiasts dislike google, but why?? google has made chromium, android, etc and most of the things they do are open source, and not only that, they also support creative commons media or public domain. i know the privacy concernes they may have, but they would never do anything bad to you. i love google personally because of their commitment to open source software.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

i know the privacy concernes they may have, but they would never do anything bad to you.

Seriously?

So;

Google would never….

And that’s just the stuff I know about and could find quickly,

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago

Their search used to be amazing, now it’s shit.

If you disagree, I’m sorry you can’t remember when there was a time that it was infinitely better. It was so good, in fact, that their name actually became a verb. Crazy, right?

They’re slowly killing Waze by removing features. Believe it or not, that app used to be even cooler too.

That. That’s why.

[-] 0x4E4F@infosec.pub 6 points 8 months ago

Their search used to be amazing, now it’s shit.

Yeah, have to agree on that. Especially if I'm looking for something niche. It used to be the opposite, you went to google if you were looking for something hard to find.

Bing seems to be a lot better for my search needs right now. Duckduckgo is just... a mess if you ask me. No relevance to results whatsoever, I usually find what I was looking for in the 10th link or so... or not at all. After 10, 15 results, duckduckgo just returns irrelevant results.

The image search in Google has gotten better though, so I still use that.

[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Google buying then killing services, probably their strongest skill. >>> https://killedbygoogle.com/

[-] yoevli@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago

Chromium is open-source. Chrome is not and also happens to constitute a majority of the browser market, and Google has tried multiple times to cash in on this market share to benefit their primary business of advertising to the detriment of users (FLoC, Manifest v3, Web Environment Integrity).

Likewise, AOSP is open-source, but Google has been progressively dismantling it and making various components closed-source (most recently the dialer app).

All this to say, Google is absolutely not friendly to FOSS. As a corporation, they're beholden to their shareholders above all else and they should be treated as an amoral entity, the same as every other publicly-traded company.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 5 points 8 months ago

Chrome itself isn't the real problem, how they managed to get Chromium everywhere is. You have one real alternative and that's Firefox (and derivatives) and it's barely surviving, which sucks.

Sure, they might not get as much money directly from non-Chrome browsers, but they get to push standards through Chromium.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] indigojasper@kbin.social 32 points 8 months ago

they will give incredibly private information to the highest bidder

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That would be bad for business. Why sell data to the highest bidder once when you can insert yourself in their value chain and seek rent forever?

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago

"but they would never do anything bad to you"

Oof, can I get this in writing? I, a massive company beholden to no one, promise to never evar backstab my loyal customers, pinky swear.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

But… their motto is “don’t be evil”! Surely, you can trust that!

/vomit,

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 4 points 8 months ago

Well, they're at least honest - they quietly changed their motto few years ago, now they can be evil.

[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

I can imagine some exec being like "oof, finally I can be evil, after all these years!"

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

Huh, I guess there are some stupid questions.

[-] amio@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I swear some people take it as a challenge.

Edit: nah, there is literally no way this guy's not trolling, and badly at that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Personally Google gives me a negative impression due to its intrusiveness and current aim of hoovering up all data possible. While you seem certain Google would never hurt you, there are many people who would never take such a risk. Even if Google was purely good of heart (which I doubt), they have proven themselves subjects to Government whims. A recent example is here: https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/18/google_keyword_search_warrants/ where a court in the United States ordered Google to return personally identifying information on any and all users who searched for the address of a crime in the month prior. And their commitment to open source is debatable as shown by their graveyard of projects (https://killedbygoogle.com/) often killed with strong usage and with dubious explanations really has strong Embrace, Extend, Extinguish vibes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Because their main purpose is to collect as much personal information as they can from their users and sell it to anyone willing to pay for it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] F4stL4ne@programming.dev 15 points 8 months ago

Because they are an advertising company.

With all that been said here, they also killed xmpp with hangout, so they're not friendly to Foss at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Because they are above all else an advertising company. Businesses like having somewhere to advertise, of course... but overall consumers don't like ads. Chrome, Android and gmail are simply ways to steer people to google search so they can sell ads. Then, like Facebook, their bread and butter is essentially privacy invasion - gathering huge dossiers of personal information on everyone they can. Google also has a reputation for being somewhat arrogant, as far as their work culture (only hiring people from elite universities, and having ridiculous 'clever' interview questions) as well as launching products, getting people to depend on them, then cancelling them with little notice or replacement. In addition, while their main product was innovative for the first several years, it's declined significantly in quality, but their near-monopoly status makes it difficult for anyone else to effectively compete. Another issue is that like Facebook, Google has basically no customer service for anyone not spending 5 million a month with them. If they decide to close down your account based on who-knows-what algorithm thing, unless you get lucky on social media or have good connections, you're screwed and all your stuff is permanently deleted.

[-] 0485919158191@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

People tend to dislike google because they collect a ton of data on you and you can't ever be sure they aren't selling it to other companies.

[-] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

You can be absolutely sure they’re selling it to every company and national government that will pay for it.

If you’re part of a marginalized group that some government would like to commit a human rights violation against in the last decade, chances are Google was a gleeful enabler on the government side.

[-] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 7 points 8 months ago

I worked for a certain “big data” company that bought browsing histories from Google (and many other companies). They absolutely sell your data; and without even anonymising the personal identification information before selling it.

(I lasted 6 weeks before the lack of ethics forced me to quit. Needed the job to pay rent and buy groceries, but I couldn’t buy enough soap to cleanse my soul).

[-] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

One more thing concerning the 'open source'. Most things Google does aren't open.

You mentioned Chromium. I don't think it would have become the most used browser platform if it hadn't been open. So I'm not sure if it's a gift or marketing decision. They kinda use it to spy on people/track behaviour. And push the web-standards they like. It's part of their strategy to retain control over every part along the way and dominate the internet. From servers, to network infrastructure to the end users device and even their software that displays the webpages.

With Android they take extra care to move more and more things into their propretary Google Services. I think the Calendar is kinda unmaintained, the ASOP keyboard is very bare. Half the Apps don't work without Play Services, Push Notifications are an important part of todays world but proprietary. The camera doesn't even have half it's capabilities and the Play Store is set to assert control over the ecosystem. Contactless Payment doesn't work with open source, ....

With Google, their open source always comes with strings attached. They're not doing it for your benefit.

If you compare it for example with Meta, they just give away PyTorch, React and their Llama2 models because they can and it' beneficial to them. I don't see too many strings attached there.

But Google has a few of those, too. TensorFlow, Kubernetes, Gerrit, Angular and the two or three programming languages.

If you like being dominated and the future of the web being shaped for you by a single company, or your wants and needs align well with their motives, I don't have any objections, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brothershamus@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago

I love open source too, but this:

i know the privacy concernes they may have, but they would never do anything bad to you.

Is just super problematic. I appreciate the enthusiasm for open source, but google is a monopoly actively involved in making the internet worse in order to profit from it. They do this by leveraging your personal information, and that's bad.

[-] Moderationslog@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago
[-] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 7 months ago

I'm not sure where you were during the time of the Snowden revelations, but I invite you to look it up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disclosures

A few things to go down the rabbit hole on:

Basically, Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and host of other American companies collect a lot of information about citizens. So much in fact that the US government decided it was good to have access to it. That, and many other things, were revealed by Snowden and other patriots.

The information has been sold to insurance companies to modify their premium for certain groups of the population. It is used to profile minorities, track activists, intimidate political opponents, fund wars abroad, and so much more. It even affects how people vote, which means that companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter have tangible influence on elections.
When the Nazis invaded countries, they used the information gathered by governments to find the Jews, and we know what happened afterwards. It was Jews then, but what if you happen to be the group targeted in the next upheaval?

Google (and companies like it), also like to use their power to snuff out competition which slows down innovation.

Black and white

The world isn't black and white. Google does amazing things, good things, but it also does many bad things. For those who care, the bad things outweigh the good. It's like drug cartels in Brazil, Colombia, and other countries: they build schools, enforce their own laws, invest in infrastructure, have political candidates, and sometimes even a form of democracy, but in the background, they violently murder rivals, fight fierce battles with law enforcement, assassinate political opponents, facilitate addiction, employ children and teens, and so much more.
If you didn't know about the bad things drug cartels do, would you support them and love them like you do Google?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dugmeup@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 8 months ago

Because their core product - search, now sucks. Why? Page 1 is mostly ads. Compared to other search tools they are a much poorer user experience. Hell even Bing is better. They push their Bing chat based engine but you know what? It does a pretty good job without destroying what I came to do with the tool which is search for stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

oof I hope you sent this from a bunker.

[-] UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

funny thing is, a guy i went to jr high with (in calgary) 'invented' a program called bumptop. ~~a few years later~~ less than a year, the guy sold everything to google for a nice sum, and got a job. next android update...was basically bumptop. seems hes still doing well for himself, colour me a bit jealous lol

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
-35 points (31.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

34333 readers
1261 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS