News

A cynic would say they intentionally choose a minimum wage worker to fracture the working class.

Especially with trump in office and the pressure he'll put on the DOJ, this trial could be a breaking point.

If it comes up the cops (more likely feds) set that up, it's not only going to get Luigi free, it might actually lead to the 99% fighting back in the class war that's been going on here longer than America has been a sovereign country.

trump won't be able to handle Luigi walking free, and he's gonna over reach

a free drink and a McDouble

Pfff, they're not gonna give em both

Also not a lawyer.

This legal doctrine is called Fruit of the Poisonous Tree and there are specific exceptions that can be made for it. According to its wikipedia page:

The doctrine is subject to four main exceptions.[citation needed] The tainted evidence is admissible if:

it was discovered in part as a result of an independent, untainted source; or

it would inevitably have been discovered despite the tainted source; or

the chain of causation between the illegal action and the tainted evidence is too attenuated; or

the search warrant was not found to be valid based on probable cause, but was executed by government agents in good faith (called the good-faith exception).

That said though, half this page is appended with [Citation Needed] so I maybe wouldn't take that as gospel.

If they found him via legal means, then that's the way they would have said they found him

A mystery man telling a woman at the counter to call before leaving minutes before swat moved in would just be a huge coincidence.

They knew he was on the bus and where it was stopping and they prepared for him.

But hey, maybe I missed something. But as far as I can remember law enforcement lost the benefit of the doubt a long time ago. I just don't trust the police in general at this point.

There are a bunch of laws outlining how governments can collect evidence. Yhere are some methods that are illegal. If they used a method prohibited by law, the evidence is unusable. If the violation to obtain the evidence is severe enough the cop gets charged.

Tainted evidence is tainted evidence...

Like, if the state illegally finds proof you committed a crime, so they can't use it, that doesn't mean the feds get to. So let's say the stuff in his backpack was already in there, and there is some plausible explanation for all the "smoking gun" evidence to not have been noticed till like 11 hours later...

No one can use what was in the backpack if they were led to it via illegal methods.

It's just inadmissible and the prosecutors have to deal with losing it if they can't show a parallel investigation had a reasonable chance of discovering it.

The gun, forgery, and ID; maybe. How he was "found", no

Did they investigate the potential that this was a suicide?

nope, Andrew witty and MR hemseley of UHG. funny thing these ceo are all originally from the UK.

Didn't say they were alive or even above ground.

and MCD lady was looking for a free payday so she named the next random person that "looked liked the killer"

Yup, that's how you get out of jail.